Insights
Navigate Through Our Insights
Explore detailed insights across industries, areas of practice, and regions
Article August 14, 2024
The Future of Prudential Barriers in Bankruptcy Appeals Post-‘Kaiser Gypsum’
David Casazza, Elizabeth Kiernan and Addison Bennett are the authors of "The Future of Prudential Barriers in Bankruptcy Appeals Post-'Kaiser Gypsum'" [PDF] published by The National Law Journal on August 14, 2024.
Client Alert June 6, 2024
Supreme Court Holds That Insurers With Financial Responsibility For Bankruptcy Claims May Be Heard In Reorganization Proceedings
Today, the Supreme Court unanimously held that an insurer with financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims is a “party in interest” under the Bankruptcy Code that has a right to participate in bankruptcy reorganization proceedings.
Client Alert June 27, 2023
Supreme Court Holds That Due Process Permits A State To Require Registered Businesses To Consent To General Jurisdiction
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that due process does not prohibit a state from requiring that businesses consent to general personal jurisdiction as a condition of registering to do business in the state. Our lawyers analyze this ruling.
Client Alert June 8, 2023
Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of First Amendment Defenses To Use Of Trademarks In “Parody” Products
Gibson Dunn lawyers discuss the Supreme Court's reversal of a decision that effectively barred trademark infringement and dilution claims against products that imitate a plaintiff’s trademark to identify the defendant’s products.
Client Alert June 15, 2022
Supreme Court Holds That The Federal Arbitration Act Requires Enforcement Of Agreements To Arbitrate Individual Claims Under California’s Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act
On June 15, 2022, the Supreme Court held that individual claims arising under California’s Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act can be compelled to arbitration.
Client Alert April 21, 2022
Supreme Court Holds That Regulation Applying Different Rules To Off-Premises Advertisements Is Content Neutral
Today, the Supreme Court held that a regulation treating on-premises signs—those that contain advertisements for the place where the signs are located—differently from off-premises signs is content neutral and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny under the First Amendment.