News & Insights
Stay Informed With Our Latest Updates
Explore our comprehensive collection of news and in-depth insights spanning practice areas, industries, and regions.
Client Alert June 4, 2026
Supreme Court Holds That Courts May Order Disgorgement Without The SEC Proving Pecuniary Loss To Investors
Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission, No. 25-466 – Decided June 4, 2026 Today, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the …
Firm News May 12, 2026
Gibson Dunn Secures Second Temporary Restraining Order Win for Edelman in Two Months, Obtaining Broad Relief to Halt Competitor’s Ongoing Client Poaching Scheme
On May 11, 2026, Gibson Dunn secured a victory in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware for our client Edelman Financial Engines, after a judge granted in full Edelman’s motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against its competitor, Prime Capital — Edelman’s second TRO victory in as many months.
Client Alert June 27, 2025
Supreme Court Holds That U.S. Preventive Task Force Members Are Inferior Officers Who May Be Appointed By The HHS Secretary
The Supreme Court held 6-3 that the members of the U.S. Preventive Task Force are inferior officers whose appointment by the HHS Secretary is consistent with the Appointments Clause.
Client Alert June 20, 2025
Supreme Court Holds That District Courts Are Not Bound By Agency Interpretations In Enforcement Proceedings
The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Hobbs Act’s exclusive review provision for administrative orders does not prevent district courts from interpreting a statutory provision in civil enforcement proceedings.
Client Alert June 28, 2024
Supreme Court Limits Scope Of Sarbanes-Oxley’s Prohibition On Obstructing Official Proceedings
The Supreme Court held 6-3 that Section 1512(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act—which prohibits obstructing official proceedings—is limited to acts that impair the availability or integrity of evidence in an official proceeding.
Client Alert April 17, 2024
Supreme Court Holds That A Title VII Plaintiff Challenging A Work Transfer Need Not Show “Significant” Harm
Today, the Supreme Court held that a Title VII plaintiff challenging a forced job transfer as discriminatory must show some harm from the transfer, but need not show that the harm was “significant,” “material,” or “serious.”
Client Alert April 12, 2024
Supreme Court Holds That The Federal Arbitration Act’s Exemption For Transportation Workers Is Not Limited To Workers In The Transportation Industry
Today, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the applicability of the Federal Arbitration Act’s exemption for transportation workers in interstate commerce turns on whether a worker is a transportation worker, not whether they work in the transportation industry.