News & Insights
Stay Informed With Our Latest Updates
Explore our comprehensive collection of news and in-depth insights spanning practice areas, industries, and regions.
Article January 30, 2025
Wildfire housing crisis tests California price-gouging law
Jeremy Smith and Daniel Rubin are the authors of "Wildfire housing crisis tests California price-gouging law" [PDF] published by the Daily Journal on January 30, 2025.
Accolades July 26, 2024
Maurice Suh, Jeremy Smith and Poonam Kumar Named Litigators of the Week
The AmLaw Litigation Daily named Maurice Suh, Jeremy Smith and Poonam Kumar its Litigators of the Week for their jury verdict win for Nike in its endorsement contract dispute with NFL wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr.
Client Alert August 1, 2023
California Supreme Court Holds Private Universities Do Not Need To Permit Cross Examination Of Witnesses In Administrative Disciplinary Proceedings
The California Supreme Court has held that private universities do not need to provide students accused of misconduct with the right to cross examine accusers and other witnesses at live hearings during administrative disciplinary proceedings.
Firm News November 15, 2022
Gibson Dunn Promotes 37 Lawyers to Partnership
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP has elected 37 lawyers to its partnership, effective January 1, 2023.
Article November 1, 2022
Standing Requirements in California Law
Los Angeles partner Maurice Suh and associate Jeremy Smith are the authors of "Standing Requirements in California Law" published by Los Angeles Lawyer in its November 2022 issue.
Article June 7, 2021
A modest proposal: Amend FRAP to permit reply briefs in support of petitions for permission to appeal
Los Angeles partner Bradley Hamburger and associate Jeremy Smith are the authors of “A modest proposal: Amend FRAP to permit …
Client Alert April 30, 2021
Second Circuit Seeks to Reconcile Circuit Split Concerning Standing to Bring Data Privacy Lawsuits
On April 26, 2021, in McMorris v. Carlos Lopez & Associates, LLC, three judges of the Second Circuit entered the muddy waters at the intersection of data privacy and constitutional law in addressing when a plaintiff in a data breach case has suffered a sufficient injury to establish standing to bring a lawsuit in federal court under Article III of the United States Constitution based on an increased risk of future identity theft.