In one case, a Gibson Dunn team secured a two-year domestic violence restraining order in favor of a low-income mother of a developmentally delayed child, who suffered years of physical, psychological, and financial abuse from her husband. Before Gibson Dunn joined the case, our client’s temporary restraining order did not include a move-out order against her husband or an order for possession of her vehicle, leaving our client without stable housing or reliable transportation. The Gibson Dunn team successfully amended the request for a temporary restraining order to seek that additional relief.
At the evidentiary hearing, Gibson Dunn presented compelling evidence that our client suffered abuse from her husband throughout their 11-year marriage. The husband testified that he had never physically or otherwise abused our client, and attempted to argue that our client was the abuser. After a contested evidentiary hearing, including cross-examination of the husband, the court sided with our client and adopted our client’s testimony in its findings, concluding that our client was more credible than her husband. In addition to the restraining order against her husband, the court awarded our client sole legal and physical custody of their child, exclusive use of the residence (with the first month’s rent paid by the husband), and immediate return of her vehicle.
In another case, our lawyers achieved a huge success by obtaining a five-year restraining order and sole legal and physical custody for our client. The referring organization, Los Angeles Center for Law and Justice (“LACLJ”) initially had warned that it would be a “very difficult” case because it was based on coercive control, including using and withholding time with the parties’ child as a means to control our client. LACLJ previewed that it was a novel legal argument and that they were unsure of the likelihood of success in the case. The team was not deterred, and advocated zealously for our client. LACLJ noted that, “thanks to their skill, dedication, bravery, and hard work in tackling this case, the client obtained a better result than we could have imagined!”