• People
  • Practices
  • Insights
    • Firm News
    • Press Releases
    • Publications
    • Webcasts
    • Podcasts
    • Subscribe
    • Media Contacts
  • Careers
    • Career Opportunities
    • Attorney Development
    • Contact Us
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Awards & Accolades
    • Offices
    • Diversity
    • Pro Bono
    • Alumni
    • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Biography
  • Education
  • Recent Publications
Profile Picture

Peter E. Seley

Peter
Seley

Partner

CONTACT INFO

pseley@gibsondunn.com

TEL:+1 202.887.3689

FAX:+1 202.530.9594

Washington, D.C.

1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20036-5306 USA

  • Print
  • |
  • Share
  • |
  • vCard

PRACTICE

Environmental Litigation and Mass Tort Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Crisis Management Energy Energy, Regulation and Litigation Litigation Oil and Gas Public Policy Transnational Litigation

BIOGRAPHY

Peter E. Seley is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and a member of the Environmental Litigation & Mass Torts Practice Group. He is recognized as a leading environmental lawyer in the District of Columbia by Chambers USA: Leading Lawyers for Business.  Mr. Seley has represented clients handling foreign and domestic environmental matters for more than 25 years, and has been at the forefront of developing jurisprudence in mass tort litigation, environmental investigations, international environmental disputes, and the use of U.S. discovery mechanisms in foreign litigation.

Mr. Seley is a Vice Chair of the ABA SEER Committee on Environmental Litigation and Toxic Torts and was recognized in the National Law Journal’s first edition of Energy & Environmental Trailblazers as one of the leading legal innovators on energy and environmental issues.

One of Mr. Seley’s cases, featured in multiple articles in legal trade publications and on 60 Minutes, involved a fraudulently obtained $19 billion judgment against Chevron for alleged environmental damages associated with oil production in the Oriente region of Ecuador.  Mr. Seley led a team of Gibson Dunn attorneys in bringing more than 20 discovery actions in jurisdictions around the United States. Information developed during that discovery revealed that the Ecuadorian judgment was the product of fraud, and as a result, Chevron filed a civil RICO action in the Southern District of New York against the plaintiffs’ lawyers and co-conspirators involved in the Ecuador case and filed an international arbitration action against Ecuador.

Mr. Seley was one of the leaders of the Gibson Dunn trial team for the seven-week RICO trial in late 2013.  In early 2014, the Southern District of New York issued a 487-page opinion finding that the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their co-conspirators had violated the RICO Act and conspired to violate the RICO Act, committing acts of extortion, mail and wire fraud, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering. That ruling was upheld by the Second Circuit in 2016 and the U.S. Supreme Court in 2017. Mr. Seley continues to be involved in follow-on actions related to the massive Ecuador fraud.

Mr. Seley also represents Chevron in climate change litigation in multiple state and federal jurisdictions around the United States. He was involved in the first climate change “tutorial” held in federal court in 2018 and was one of the leaders of the team that successfully argued for dismissal of the first two climate change public nuisance cases to be considered on the merits.

Mr. Seley has managed a number of significant internal investigations regarding environmental issues, including compliance with regulatory requirements for automobile emissions, management of oil field wastes, and compliance with environmental regulations during wind-up of resource extraction operations.  A number of these investigations are cross-border, multinational investigations involving billions of dollars of potential expenditures and the risk of civil or criminal sanctions.

Mr. Seley regularly handles mass tort and “contaminated community” toxic tort cases in courts around the country. He has, for example, handled cases involving personal injury and property damage claims based on vapor intrusion and exposure to crude oil in soil, allegations of exposure to hexavalent chromium and TCE in air and groundwater, and claims based on releases of solvents and metals from an aircraft manufacturing facility.

Mr. Seley also has represented clients and industry coalitions impacted by state and federal agency actions, including a multi-circuit challenge to an EPA Clean Water Act rulemaking impacting the nation’s pulp and paper industry, an APA challenge to a Department of Interior rulemaking on an agricultural payment-in-kind program, a challenge to the Department of the Interior’s “Roadless Rule” that would have made more than 50 million acres of woodlands off-limits for active management, Clean Air Act challenges to California regulation of automobile emissions and Virginia’s adoption of California “Zero Emission Vehicles,” and a variety of NEPA challenges to the Department of the Interior’s efforts to take agricultural land for various projects in South Florida.

Mr. Seley also has defended clients in numerous citizen suits and State and Federal enforcement actions, involving a variety of different statutory and regulatory programs, including a multi-million dollar citizen suit in the Maryland District and Bankruptcy Courts alleging violations of the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, TSCA, and various state laws, a multi-million dollar citizen suit in South Florida alleging violations of the Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act, a $600 million Clean Air Act/New Source Review EPA enforcement action in Maryland, a large CERCLA/RCRA groundwater cleanup action in Southern California, a multi-million dollar  CERCLA claim in Pennsylvania federal court involving novel successor liability issues, a multi-site Clean Water Act /RCRA criminal enforcement action in Virginia, and pre-enforcement defense of several clients investigated or in receipt of Notices of Violation under the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act,  RCRA, and State analogues.

Mr. Seley has represented clients prosecuting and defending CERCLA cost-recovery and contribution actions, including defending a $500 million CERCLA cost recovery action in Southern California, defending a multi-million dollar CERCLA claim in Virginia involving novel mixed funding/orphan share issues, prosecuting a $250 million CERCLA action against the United States for contribution based on government involvement at a contractor-operated manufacturing facility in California, and prosecuting a $100 million CERCLA action against the United States for involvement at a WWII-era aircraft component facility in New York.

Mr. Seley’s work also includes significant matters before Federal appellate courts, including appeals in the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits, and amicus briefs filed in numerous appellate courts and in the Supreme Court.

EDUCATION

Cornell University - 1993 Juris Doctor

Princeton University - 1990 Bachelor of Arts

ADMISSIONS

District of Columbia Bar

RECENT PUBLICATIONS

Client Alert - January 22, 2018 | 2017 Year-End Environmental Update for the Oil & Gas Industry
Article - March 7, 2016 | Emerging Trends In Climate Change Litigation
Article - December 2, 2015 | The Unrealized Promise Of Rule 26 Amendments
Client Alert - February 3, 2011 | EPA To Regulate Perchlorate and Sixteen Other Chemicals in Drinking Water
Client Alert - November 5, 2009 | Profit or Profiteering: The Growing Fight Over ‘Double Recovery’ in CERCLA
Client Alert - August 21, 2009 | California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Proposes New, More Stringent, Drinking Water Standard for Hexavalent Chromium
Client Alert - July 30, 2009 | Insurance and Equity in CERCLA: The Missed Opportunity of Friedland v. TIC
Client Alert - June 26, 2009 | U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Discharge of “Fill Material” Can Be Permitted by the Corps of Engineers Under Section 404 of The Clean Water Act, Even If EPA’s Effluent Restrictions Otherwise Would Apply
Client Alert - March 2, 2009 | McDonald v. Sun Oil: The Ninth Circuit’s Constitutionally Questionable Expansion of CERCLA’s Toxic Tort Discovery Rule
Client Alert - February 2, 2009 | Western District of Washington Limits Access To Section 113(f)(1) of CERCLA
Client Alert - November 3, 2008 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico Affirms “But For” Test Is Required to Prove Causation in Toxic Tort Lawsuit
Client Alert - July 31, 2008 | House Passes Bill to Impose Stricter Regulations on Consumer Products
Client Alert - July 2, 2008 | U.S. Supreme Court to Consider Whether Discharges of Fill Material Must Comply with EPA Effluent Limitations
  • Sitemap
  • Client Extranet
  • Legal Notices
  • Modern Slavery Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
©Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2023. All rights reserved.
Top
Gibson Dunn uses cookies which are essential for our website to function. With your consent, we and third parties may also use non-essential cookies to collect information about your browsing activities, and improve the content, functionality and performance of our website. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of all cookies on our website as set out in our Cookie Notice. You can reject all non-essential cookies by clicking “Reject All”. Choose "Manage Cookies" to view and customize your cookie settings.
Manage CookiesACCEPT ALLREJECT ALL
Manage consent

Your Privacy Choices / Cookies

This website uses cookies – small text files stored on your device, when you visit a website - including third party cookies to collect information about your browsing activities and improve the content, functionality and performance of our website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as Necessary Cookies are stored on your browser as they are essential for the operation of the website. You may accept all cookies, or reject all cookies other than Necessary Cookies.  If you visit us from a different device or browser, or clear cookies, then you may need to return to this screen to re-select your preferences.   Note that rejecting some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Please note that if you do not make a selection below, only necessary cookies will be set.

You can learn more about our processing of your personal data by visiting our Privacy Policy.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are essential for our website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in, or filling in forms. Without these cookies, our website will not operate properly.   Cookie Details
Analytics
These cookies are used to collect information on how you use our website, including information about the pages you visited, how long you visited and if you experienced any errors. We use this information to help us improve the quality of our website and monitor the level of activity on our website. They may be set by third parties whose services have been added to our pages. Cookie Details
Save & Accept