July 16, 2010
On July 15, 2010, the Senate voted (60-39) to approve the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Act"), which is expected to be signed into law next week by President Obama. Included among the Act’s sweeping changes to the regulation of the U.S. financial markets is the Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act of 2010, which requires that investment advisers to hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate funds, and certain other private funds with assets under management ("AUM") of $150 million or more register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), comply with certain SEC books, records, and reporting requirements, and be subject to periodic SEC examination. Advisers to venture capital funds will not be required to register with the SEC, but will be required to maintain records and provide annual and other reports prescribed by the SEC. These amendments become effective one year after the enactment of the Act.
The Act provides exemptions from registration for family offices, and certain foreign private advisers with fewer than 15 clients and investors, and also provides a limited intrastate exemption.
1. Elimination of Private Adviser Exemption
The Act amends section 203(b)(3) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act") to eliminate the 15 or fewer client exemption that currently allows many advisers to avoid registration with the SEC. Accordingly, advisers to hedge funds and private equity funds will be required to register with the SEC if they have at least $150 million of AUM. Sec. 403. A "private fund" is defined as an issuer that would be an investment company, as defined in section 3 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"), but for section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) thereof. Sec. 402.
Analysis: This provision will require the registration of many previously exempted investment advisers to hedge funds and private equity funds, although the threshold for SEC registration will be reset to at least $100 million AUM.
2. Limited Foreign Private Adviser Exemption
The exemption for foreign private advisers is narrower than under current section 203(b)(3) of the Advisers Act because, among other things, it requires the adviser to look through the private fund and count the number of U.S. investors in the fund as well as the fund itself in determining whether the adviser exceeds the limit of 15 clients and investors in the United States. Sec. 403. To be exempt, an investment adviser must meet the definition of "foreign private adviser," which means that it:
Analysis: This provision could potentially bring many foreign investment advisers with very few United States contacts under the ambit of SEC registration. The narrowing of this exemption may ultimately affect foreign advisers’ decisions on whether to seek U.S. investors.
3. Limited Intrastate Exemption
The intrastate exemption found in section 203(b)(1) of the Advisers Act for advisers to funds whose clients are all residents of the state within which the adviser has its principal office and place of business is narrowed to exclude investment advisers to private funds, except for foreign private advisers, as discussed above. Sec. 403.
4. Limited Small Business Investment Company Adviser Exemption
New section 203(b)(7) exempts from registration investment advisers who solely advise:
Advisers that are Business Development Companies, however, are not exempt. Sec. 403.
5. Venture Capital Fund Advisers
New section 203(l) of the Advisers Act exempts venture capital fund advisers from registration under the Advisers Act with respect to investment advice provided to venture capital funds. Even though not required to register with the SEC, venture capital fund advisers will be required to maintain such records and to provide annual or other reports to the SEC as the SEC deems necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. The SEC is required to define the term "venture capital fund" within one year of enactment of the Act. Sec. 407.
Analysis: The availability of this exemption will depend on the SEC’s definition of "venture capital funds." Venture capital firms will want to provide input on the SEC’s proposals to make sure that they are included within the definition, and advisers to other private funds will want to evaluate whether the funds that they manage are more appropriately described as "venture capital funds." Moreover, the benefit of this exemption largely will depend upon the scope of the recordkeeping and reporting requirements promulgated by the SEC for venture capital funds.
6. Private Fund Advisers with AUM of Less Than $150 Million
The SEC has authority, pursuant to new section 203(m) of the Advisers Act, to exempt from registration any investment adviser that solely advises private funds, as defined above, and has AUM in the United States of less than $150 million. Even if exempted from registration, such advisers must maintain records and provide to the SEC such annual or other reports as the SEC determines are appropriate. In developing registration requirements and examination procedures for these "mid-sized" private fund advisers, the SEC is required to take into account fund size, governance, investment strategy, and level of systemic risk posed by the fund. Sec. 408.
Analysis: As with advisers to venture capital funds, mid-size private fund advisers will need to await the SEC’s coming rulemaking as to recordkeeping and reporting requirements that will be imposed on such advisers.
7. Family Offices
Section 202(a)(11)(G) of the Advisers Act was amended to exempt from the definition of "investment adviser" (and therefore, from registration) any family office, as that term is defined by the SEC. This definition is to be consistent with SEC exemptive orders in effect at the time of enactment of the Act and to recognize the range of organizational, management and employment structures and arrangements utilized by family offices. Even if an investment adviser is exempt from registration under this provision, it will be subject to the antifraud provisions of section 206 of the Advisers Act. Sec. 409.
Analysis: Codification of the exemption through the SEC’s definition of "family office" will eliminate the need for individual exemptions for family offices, but clients with family offices will want to review the SEC’s definition, when proposed, to make sure that they are covered by the exemption.
The AUM threshold for an investment adviser to register with the SEC was raised from $25 million to $100 million in Advisers Act section 203A(a)(1). Accordingly, investment advisers that do not satisfy the higher AUM requirement will be required to register with the states rather than with the SEC, unless they are (1) advisers to an investment company registered under the 1940 Act, (2) Business Development Companies that have not withdrawn their election under the 1940 Act, or (3) required to register with 15 or more states. Sec. 410; Sec. 419.
Analysis: This provision will require many mid-size investment advisers to register with one or more states rather than the SEC, although the Act includes a one-year transition period during which any adviser may, at its discretion, register with the SEC. It is possible that advisers who are currently registered with the SEC will be grandfathered in so that they can retain their registrations, even if they will not meet the new AUM requirement.
As a result of the increased burden on state regulators, we may see higher state registration and licensing fees, regulatory sharing agreements between states, and other changes to help the states manage their additional responsibilities and expenses.
New section 204(b) of the Advisers Act requires registered investment advisers to maintain records and make reports to the SEC regarding private funds advised by the adviser, as determined by the SEC to be necessary in the public interest and for the protection of investors. The SEC is, in turn, required to provide such reports or records to the Financial Stability Oversight Council (the "Council") as the Council determines are necessary to assess the systemic risk of a private fund. For these purposes, the records of any private fund advised by an investment adviser would be deemed the records and reports of the investment adviser. The SEC is required to adopt rules specifying the types of records that private fund advisers must make, the retention period for such records, and the reports such advisers will be required to file. Sec. 404.
1. Required Information; Consultation with the Council
The records and reports required to be maintained by an investment adviser and subject to SEC inspection include, for each private fund, a description of:
i. the amount of AUM and use of leverage, including off-balance sheet leverage;
ii. counterparty credit risk exposure;
iii. trading and investment positions;
iv. valuation policies and practices of the fund;
v. types of assets held;
vi. side arrangements or side letters whereby certain investors in the fund obtain more favorable rights or entitlements than other investors;
vii. trading practices; and
viii. such other information as the SEC determines, in consultation with the Council, is necessary and appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of investors or for the assessment of systemic risk. This could result in different reporting requirements for different classes of private fund advisers based on the type or size of the fund being advised.
Analysis: The Act requires only that a description of the above information to be provided. The level of detail and format will be determined through the SEC’s rulemaking.
2. Examinations of Records and Confidentiality
Records of private funds that are maintained by a registered investment adviser are subject to periodic, special and other examination by the SEC at any time and from time to time, as the SEC may prescribe as necessary and appropriate. The SEC is required to make available to the Council all reports, documents, records, and information filed with or provided to the SEC by an investment adviser to a private fund for systemic risk assessment purposes. All such reports, documents, records and information obtained from the SEC under this section would be required to be kept confidential pursuant to section 204(b)(8) of the Advisers Act.
The SEC is also required to provide this information to (a) Congress, upon an agreement of confidentiality; (b) any other federal department or agency or self-regulatory organization ("SRO") requesting information or reports for purposes within the scope of its jurisdiction; or (c) pursuant to a court order in an action brought by the SEC or otherwise by the U.S. government. The Council and any department, agency, or SRO that receives information or reports from the SEC is subject to the same level of confidentiality as the SEC. In addition, all such parties are exempt from the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act (5 USC §552) ("FOIA"), which compels federal agencies to disclose to the public any records requested in writing, unless such records are protected by an exemption under FOIA.
Any "proprietary information" of an investment adviser that the SEC ascertains from any report required to be filed with the SEC is subject to the same limitations on public disclosure as any facts ascertained during an examination as set forth in section 210(b) of the Advisers Act. "Proprietary information" includes sensitive, non-public information regarding an adviser’s investment or trading strategies, analytical or research methodologies, trading data, computer hardware or software containing intellectual property and other information the SEC determines is proprietary. Sec. 404.
Section 210(c) of the Advisers Act now authorizes the SEC to disclose the identity of an investment adviser’s clients for the purpose of assessing potential systemic risks as well as in connection with a proceeding or investigation relating to the enforcement of the Advisers Act. Sec. 405.
Analysis: It is not yet known what the examination protocols will be with respect to registered investment advisers to private funds. While the SEC’s examinations of private fund records initially may be broad, as SEC staff develops additional experience with the private funds generally and with the newly registered advisers specifically, we may see more tailored examination protocols. The scope of information that will be required and shared among regulators in order to assess systemic risk remains a concern, particularly with respect to sensitive information such as client identity.
Within one year of enactment of the Act, and after consultation with the Council, the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the "CFTC") are required to jointly promulgate rules to establish the form and content of reports required to be filed with the SEC and CFTC by investment advisers that are dually registered with both agencies. Sec. 406.
Analysis: A key issue during the rulemaking process will be the extent of redundant SEC/CFTC regulation, including the potential for duplicative examinations.
New Advisers Act section 223 requires registered investment advisers to take SEC-prescribed steps to safeguard client assets over which they have custody, including but not limited to, verification of such assets by an independent public accountant. Sec. 411.
The U.S Comptroller General is required to conduct a study on the compliance costs associated with the current SEC rules regarding custody of funds or securities of clients of investment advisers as well as the additional costs if the provisions relating to operational independence are eliminated. The report is due to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the House Committee on Financial Services within three years of enactment of the Act. Sec. 412.
The Comptroller is required to conduct a study on the feasibility of forming an SRO to oversee private funds. The report is due within one year of enactment of the Act. Sec. 416.
Analysis: This study is in addition to the SEC’s study of the regulation and oversight of broker-dealers and investment advisers, which is due in six months, and is expected to address the issue of an SRO for investment advisers. If the Comptroller recommends the formation of an SRO, it is unclear at this point who would comprise the entity, the scope of its regulatory authority, and whether the states would incorporate the concept of an SRO into their regulatory regimes.
Gibson Dunn lawyers are available to assist in addressing any questions you may have regarding the impact of these issues for broker-dealers. Please contact K. Susan Grafton (202-887-3554, firstname.lastname@example.org), any of the following, or the Gibson Dunn lawyer with whom you work:
© 2010 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Attorney Advertising: The enclosed materials have been prepared for general informational purposes only and are not intended as legal advice.