• People
  • Practices
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Insights
    • Firm News
    • Press Releases
    • Publications
    • Webcasts
    • Podcasts
    • Subscribe
    • Media Contacts
  • Careers
    • Career Opportunities
    • Attorney Development
    • Contact Us
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Awards & Accolades
    • Offices
    • Diversity
    • Pro Bono
    • Alumni
    • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Biography
  • Education
  • Recent Publications
Profile Picture

Kahn A. Scolnick

Kahn
Scolnick

Partner

CONTACT INFO

kscolnick@gibsondunn.com

TEL:+1 213.229.7656

FAX:+1 213.229.6656

Los Angeles

333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 USA

  • Print
  • |
  • Share
  • |
  • vCard

PRACTICE

Appellate and Constitutional Law Class Actions Litigation Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) Securities Litigation Transnational Litigation

BIOGRAPHY

Kahn Scolnick is an appellate and litigation partner in the Los Angeles office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.  He serves as Co-Partner in Charge of the Los Angeles and Century City offices, Co-Chair of the firm’s Class Actions Practice Group, and is also an active member of the Appellate and Constitutional Law and Securities Litigation Practice Groups, among others. He specializes in class actions, complex commercial cases, and litigating a variety of constitutional issues—both in the trial courts and on appeal.

Representative trial court experience:

  • Won a complete defense verdict following a lengthy bench trial before the California Superior Court in two consolidated nationwide class actions against a commercial mortgage lender.
  • Persuaded a California trial court to vacate a $173 million penalty that the California Insurance Commissioner issued under the Unfair Insurance Practices Act.
  • Defeated class certification in a novel “no poach” class action against a major sandwich restaurant chain.
  • Defended an automotive manufacturer, a number of its subsidiaries, and certain of its officers and directors in a highly publicized shareholder class action.
  • He was part of the trial team that successfully represented Chevron Corporation in a RICO case against those seeking to extort billions of dollars from the company based on a fraudulently procured multi-billion-dollar judgment in Ecuador.
  • Defended a city in a lengthy bench trial alleging a violation of the California Voting Rights Act and Equal Protection Clause.
  • Defeated certification of a putative nationwide consumer class action in the Central District of California concerning nutritional labeling.
  • Obtained a complete defense verdict following an eight-week jury trial in the California Superior Court (the case was a mass action brought by hundreds of homeowners alleging a private nuisance).
  • Persuaded a Nevada trial court to grant summary adjudication of plaintiffs’ prayer for punitive damages in a mass action one week before the start of a scheduled 12-week jury trial (the case then settled on the second day of trial).
  • Achieved dismissal with prejudice of a wage-and-hour class action in the Northern District of California on behalf of a leading retailer.
  • Won judgment on the pleadings of the defendants’ sole affirmative defense (unclean hands) in a contentious corporate dispute in the Delaware Chancery Court.
  • Successfully briefed and argued an opposition to a preliminary injunction motion in Nevada, which sought to enjoin a $2.8 billion merger of two gaming companies.  As a result of the ruling, the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss the entire case voluntarily, with each side paying their own fees and costs.

Representative appellate experience:

  • Obtained a published decision from the California Court of Appeal striking down a $100 million rate increase and refund order by the California Insurance Commissioner.
  • Persuaded the California Court of Appeal to reverse a trial court judgment finding a city liable for a violation of the California Voting Rights Act and a violation of the Equal Protection Clause, based on the City’s at-large method of electing its council (the case is now pending before the California Supreme Court).
  • Won a major victory in the California Court of Appeal in a CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) case that will transform the way cargo moves through the Port of LA.
  • Advised the inaugural California Citizens Redistricting Commission on a variety of legal issues including the Voting Rights Act and equal protection, and then successfully defended the Commission’s maps against an assortment of constitutional and statutory claims before the California Supreme Court.
  • He was a key member the appellate team (in both the Second Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court) in Chevron’s successful RICO suit involving a fraudulent multi-billion-dollar judgment, described above.
  • Secured the reversals on appeal of judgments totaling $295 million in three certified class actions in New Mexico and California involving installment payment plans for auto insurance policies.
  • Persuaded the California Court of Appeal to affirm the dismissal with prejudice of a high-profile wrongful death action against a major university.
  • Prevailed on summary judgment in a high-profile “taxpayer” action challenging the constitutionality of a California statute – and then persuaded the California Court of Appeal to affirm in a published decision, of which the California Supreme Court denied review.
  • Obtained a published decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversing a substantial award of attorney’s fees.

Mr. Scolnick graduated magna cum laude in 2003 from the University of San Diego, School of Law.  He was a Lead Articles Editor for the San Diego Law Review and was awarded the Outstanding Student in Constitutional Law.  Mr. Scolnick received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Public Policy Studies, with honors, from Michigan State University in 2000.

Before joining the firm in 2006, Mr. Scolnick served as a law clerk to Judge Ferdinand F. Fernandez of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (2005–06), and as a law clerk to Judge Dana M. Sabraw of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California (2003–05).  While in law school, Mr. Scolnick served as a judicial extern to Judge M. Margaret McKeown of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and also to Magistrate Judge Louisa S. Porter of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Mr. Scolnick has published and spoken on a variety of topics, including class actions, trial practice, civil procedure, punitive damages, voting rights, and constitutional issues.  He was named eight times as one of Southern California’s “Rising Stars” by Los Angeles Magazine and Southern California Super Lawyers. Mr. Scolnick serves on the board and executive committee of the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles (LAFLA) and on the board of the Los Angeles Chapter of the Association of Business Trial Lawyers (ABTL).

Mr. Scolnick is a member of the California Bar.  He is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the United States District Courts for the Northern, Southern, and Central Districts of California.

 

 

EDUCATION

University of San Diego - 2003 Juris Doctor

Michigan State University - 2000 Bachelor of Arts

ADMISSIONS

California Bar

RECENT PUBLICATIONS

Client Alert - January 26, 2023 | Year-End and Fourth Quarter 2022 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - October 31, 2022 | Third Quarter 2022 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - August 23, 2022 | Class Actions to Reshape the Litigation Landscape in Europe in 2023
Client Alert - July 28, 2022 | Second Quarter 2022 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - April 28, 2022 | First Quarter 2022 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - April 11, 2022 | Ninth Circuit Issues Important En Banc Opinion Regarding Class Certification Issues
Client Alert - January 27, 2022 | Year-End and Fourth Quarter 2021 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - November 2, 2021 | Third Quarter 2021 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - August 23, 2021 | Second Quarter 2021 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - June 25, 2021 | Supreme Court Holds That Article III Requires All Class Members To Prove An Injury In Fact To Recover Damages
Article - May 20, 2021 | Ruling will protect noncitizens from consequences of uninformed guilty pleas
Client Alert - April 28, 2021 | First Quarter 2021 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - January 22, 2021 | Year-End and Fourth Quarter 2020 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - November 10, 2020 | Third Quarter 2020 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - July 24, 2020 | Second Quarter 2020 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - April 24, 2020 | First Quarter 2020 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - January 31, 2020 | Year-End and Fourth Quarter 2019 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - November 6, 2019 | Third Quarter 2019 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - July 25, 2019 | Second Quarter 2019 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - May 14, 2019 | First Quarter 2019 Update on Class Actions
Publications - January 18, 2019 | Fourth Quarter 2018 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - October 24, 2018 | Third Quarter 2018 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - July 18, 2018 | Second Quarter 2018 Update on Class Actions
Article - June 5, 2018 | A Better Method For Achieving Broader Class Action Reform
Client Alert - May 4, 2018 | First Quarter 2018 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - January 30, 2018 | Fourth Quarter 2017 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - November 7, 2017 | Third Quarter 2017 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - August 1, 2017 | Second Quarter 2017 Update on Class Actions
Article - July 25, 2017 | Viewing Class Settlements Through a New Lens: Part 1 and Part 2
Client Alert - May 19, 2017 | First Quarter 2017 Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - February 1, 2017 | 2016 Year-End Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - October 27, 2016 | Third Quarter 2016 Update on Class Actions
Article - August 19, 2016 | Rule Of Law Trumps Rhetoric In Chevron’s 2nd Circ. Win
Client Alert - August 9, 2016 | Chevron Earns Decisive Victory in Second Circuit Civil RICO Appeal Concerning Corrupt Scheme to Obtain $9.5 Billion Ecuadorian Judgment Through Bribery and Fraud
Webcasts - February 24, 2016 | Webcast – Insolvency, Incivility, and Incorrigibility: A Look Into the World of High-Stakes, Bare-Knuckles Bankruptcy Litigation
Client Alert - February 1, 2016 | 2015 Year-End Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - January 30, 2015 | 2014 Year-End Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - September 30, 2014 | Media Relations in High-Profile Litigation: Chevron Corp. v. Donziger
Client Alert - April 1, 2013 | Case Assessment and Evaluation
Client Alert - February 20, 2013 | Class Actions Update: Key Trends and Key Cases in the Year Ahead
Client Alert - January 30, 2012 | 2011 Year-End Update on Class Actions
Client Alert - August 18, 2010 | A Tax by Any Other Name: Constitutional Challenges to Revenue-Raising Measures
Client Alert - July 14, 2009 | Ninth Circuit Issues A Trilogy Of Decisions That May Significantly Enhance Defendants’ Ability To Contest Class Certification And Liability
Client Alert - October 1, 2008 | The Supreme Court Sets New Punitive Damage Limits Under Federal Common Law
Client Alert - August 12, 2008 | Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Clarifies the Reach of Federal Jurisdiction for “Mass Actions” Under The Federal Class Action Fairness Act
  • Sitemap
  • Client Extranet
  • Legal Notices
  • Modern Slavery Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
©Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2023. All rights reserved.
Top