Appellate and Constitutional Law

LEADERS

Overview

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher is renowned for its award-winning Appellate and Constitutional Law Practice Group, one of the largest and most experienced appellate practices in the nation. Each year, we present arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States, all 13 federal courts of appeals, and state appellate courts throughout the country. We work closely with trial teams to preserve arguments and develop a winning litigation strategy. When the occasion calls for it, we also develop novel or complex legal theories, sometimes long before the suit is filed. No firm has a stronger record of appellate success.

Renowned U.S. Supreme Court Advocacy

Gibson Dunn has an unmatched record of success representing clients before the Supreme Court of the United States. With its diverse team of Supreme Court practitioners, Gibson Dunn consistently litigates multiple Supreme Court cases each Term, among the most of any firm. We regularly achieve victory in the most challenging cases with the highest stakes.

  • Gibson Dunn lawyers have argued nearly 160 cases before the Supreme Court, with eleven current attorneys having argued at the Court.
  • We build Supreme Court cases from the ground up, working hand-in-hand with trial attorneys to develop a strong record for appellate review and position each case for Supreme Court review if necessary.
  • Our Supreme Court victories have been some of the biggest and most consequential in history:
    • Bush v. Gore, which resolved Florida’s recount dispute in the 2000 presidential election.
    • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down limits on corporate independent expenditures under the First Amendment.
    • Hollingsworth v. Perry, which defeated an effort by the proponents of California’s Proposition 8 to defend the proposition in court.
    • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, the most important Supreme Court decision in decades on the limits of certifying claims for class action treatment.
    • Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, which reformed the law of patent eligibility.
    • National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, which struck down presidential appointments made while the Senate was in pro forma session.
    • Daimler AG v. Bauman, which recognized important due process limits on courts’ exercise of personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.
    • Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, which struck down prohibitions on the legalization of sports wagering.
    • Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission, which held that SEC administrative law judges are “Officers of the United States” who must be appointed consistent with the Appointments Clause.
    • Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, which struck down DHS’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Unparalleled Federal and State Appellate Advocacy

In addition to our Supreme Court practice, Gibson Dunn attorneys handle a wide range of appellate matters in the federal courts of appeals and the state appellate courts.

  • Each year, we brief and argue federal appeals in every regional circuit, the D.C. Circuit, the Federal Circuit, and dozens of state courts of appeals—averaging one appeal approximately every three business days.
  • Our appellate attorneys regularly work alongside the trial team to anticipate legal issues and position our clients for victory on appeal even while the case remains in the trial court. This comprehensive approach to litigation permits us to leverage the wide expertise of lawyers across all of Gibson Dunn’s diverse practices.
  • When government action is at issue, our appellate lawyers work with the firm’s nationally recognized Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Group. We have achieved significant victories in some of the biggest administrative proceedings across the federal government, including the FCC’s Net Neutrality proceeding and numerous SEC rules regulating the national securities exchanges.

Select Accolades

  • Benchmark Litigation US 2022 ranked Gibson Dunn’s Appellate practice Tier 1 nationally, and named the firm its 2022 East Coast Appellate Firm of the Year.
  • U.S. News – Best Lawyers® named Gibson Dunn the 2022 “Law Firm of the Year” for Appellate Practice in its “Best Law Firms” survey. Only one law firm is recognized in each national practice area.
  • The American Lawyer named Gibson Dunn a Finalist in its 2021 Litigation Department of the Year competition, noting that “when news breaks and the pressure rises, clients call Gibson Dunn’s litigators to regain control.” This award follows our unprecedented four wins in this biennial competition. Ted Boutrous also was named 2020 Litigator of the Year, Grand Prize, recognizing that he was “at the center of some of the nation’s most closely watched cases on the First Amendment, the rule of law, privacy and more.”
  • Law360 named Gibson Dunn a 2021 Appellate Group of the Year, for the third year in a row, marking the firm’s tenth appearance on its annual list of top appellate groups since 2011.
  • Chambers USA 2022 ranked Gibson Dunn in Tier 1 nationwide for 37 practice groups, including Appellate Law.
  • The National Law Journal named Gibson Dunn to its 2021 Appellate Hot List, which “highlights law firms that have handled exemplary appellate matters.”
  • The American Lawyer ranked Gibson Dunn on its 2021 A-List, its most prestigious annual survey of the most elite law firms in the United States.

Our Team

Gibson Dunn has more than 200 lawyers who practice appellate and constitutional law in our offices across the United States, and is home to more than 240 attorneys who served as law clerks in the federal and state appellate courts, including more than 25 who clerked at the U.S. Supreme Court. In addition, one of our lawyers held the prestigious Bristow Fellowship awarded by the U.S. Solicitor General.

Allyson Ho, Thomas H. Dupree, Jr. and Julian W. Poon are the Chairs of the Appellate Practice Group. All are widely regarded as among the nation’s most accomplished appellate litigators. Ms. Ho has presented over 70 oral arguments in federal and state courts nationwide, including multiple high-stakes cases on behalf of business before the U.S. Supreme Court. She also has a distinguished record of experience at the highest levels of the federal government. Mr. Dupree has briefed and argued several cases in the Supreme Court of the United States and more than 80 cases in the federal courts of appeals. He previously served as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, overseeing more than 900 lawyers. Mr. Poon appears regularly before federal and state appellate courts in California, including the Ninth Circuit, the California Supreme Court, and the California Court of Appeal. He has been recognized as an outstanding appellate lawyer by Chambers and a “Litigation Star” by Benchmark Litigation.

Three of our partners served in the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States, the office charged with representing the United States before the U.S. Supreme Court:

  • Theodore Olson served as U.S. Solicitor General from 2001 to 2004. Between his government service and private practice, Mr. Olson has argued 65 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • Miguel Estrada served as Assistant to the Solicitor General from 1992 to 1997. Between his government service and private practice, Mr. Estrada has argued 24 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • Thomas G. Hungar served as Deputy Solicitor General from 2003 to 2008, and as Assistant to the Solicitor General from 1992 to 1994. He was also General Counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives from 2016 to 2019. Between his government service and private practice, Mr. Hungar has argued 26 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.

In addition, numerous other partners have held high-ranking government positions, including Helgi Walker and Elizabeth Papez.

Our attorneys have been honored as the “Litigator of the Week” or “Litigator of the Year” by The American Lawyer numerous times:

  • In June 2019, Matt McGill was awarded Litigator of the Week for his successful challenge to the Department of Justice’s reinterpretation of interstate gambling statute.
  • In August 2018, Miguel Estrada and Robert Weigel were recognized as Litigators of the Week for their success in seeking to attach assets of Venezuela to satisfy an arbitration award (in a decision that was later upheld by the Third Circuit).
  • In November 2018, Ted Olson and Ted Boutrous were awarded Litigators of the Week for their successful challenge to the White House’s revocation of the press pass of CNN’s Jim Acosta. Ted Boutrous was recognized again in September 2019 for a similar victory involving Playboy White House reporter Brian Karem.
  • In May 2018, Ted Olson was recognized as Litigator of the Week for his victory in the Supreme Court overturning the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992.
  • In 2014, Miguel Estrada was awarded Litigator of the Year for, among other things, his groundbreaking win before the Supreme Court in NLRB v. Noel Canning.

EXPERIENCE & RECENT REPRESENTATIONS

  • In FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project (U.S. 2021), we successfully represented industry members in defending the FCC’s decision to repeal or modify three of its media ownership rules.
  • In Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California (U.S. 2020), we secured a decision vacating the Trump administration’s effort to repeal the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy and protecting over a million participants in the program from deportation and revocation of work authorization.
  • In Lucia v. SEC (U.S. 2018), we persuaded the Supreme Court that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s administrative law judges are “Officers of the United States” who must be appointed in conformity with the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
  • In three cases named The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC v. SEC (D.C. Cir. 2020), we secured rulings vacating the SEC’s Transaction Fee Pilot program and holding that Section 19(d) of the Securities Exchange Act does not authorize the SEC to review generally applicable fee rules filed by exchanges.
  • In Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles (U.S. 2013), we secured a unanimous Supreme Court decision for Standard Fire enforcing the Class Action Fairness Act.
  • In Comcast Corp. v. Behrend (U.S. 2013), we secured a victory for Comcast when the Supreme Court reversed an order certifying a class of more than two million Comcast subscribers and placed new limits on classwide damages.
  • In Wal-Mart v. Dukes (U.S. 2011), we obtained a landmark victory for the world’s largest retailer when the Supreme Court unanimously reversed class certification of the biggest employment discrimination class in history.
  • In Magadia v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (9th Cir. 2021), we obtained reversal of an over‑$100 million judgment, defeating the certified class claims in their entirety.
  • In Forby v. One Technologies, L.P., (5th Cir. 2021), we secured dismissal of a putative class action under the Credit Repair Organizations Act against a leading provider of credit-monitoring services.
  • In Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (U.S. 2018), we convinced the Supreme Court to invalidate federal limits on sports gambling as inconsistent with federalism and anticommandeering principles.
  • In NLRB v. Noel Canning (U.S. 2014), on behalf of Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and 44 other U.S. Senators, we persuaded the Supreme Court to unanimously affirm a landmark separation-of-powers decision that held unconstitutional three 2012 appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.
  • In Hollingsworth v. Perry (U.S. 2013), Gibson Dunn obtained a historic marriage equality victory that left intact the district court’s broad injunction against the enforcement of California Proposition 8, an amendment to the California Constitution restricting marriage in the state to between one man and one woman.
  • In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (U.S. 2010), Gibson Dunn obtained a groundbreaking campaign finance victory that established the First Amendment rights of corporations to engage in political speech.
  • In Bush v. Gore (U.S. 2000), and Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board (U.S. 2000), Gibson Dunn successfully served as lead counsel for candidate George W. Bush in federal court litigation stemming from the disputed ballot counting in Florida during the 2000 U.S. presidential election, prevailing on equal protection grounds.
  • In People v. Amazon.com, Inc. (N.Y. App. Div. 2022), we obtained an appellate victory based on federal labor‑law preemption that resulted in the complete dismissal of a state enforcement action alleging violation of state anti-retaliation laws.
  • In Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. Nevils (U.S. 2017), we obtained a victory for Coventry when the Supreme Court unanimously held that the Federal Employee Health Benefits Act preempts state laws that purport to regulate the administration of federal health benefits.
  • In Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust (U.S. 2016), we obtained a Supreme Court ruling in favor of our client, holding that Puerto Rico’s Public Corporation Debt and Recovery Act, which purported to create a binding bankruptcy-like debt-restructuring regime for the Commonwealth’s highly indebted public entities, was preempted by federal law.
  • In Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila (U.S. 2004), we won a landmark victory for Aetna and CIGNA when the Supreme Court unanimously held that the Employee Retirement Insurance Security Act of 1974 completely preempts state-law actions by participants and beneficiaries of employee health benefit plans for matters relating to the plans’ coverage decision.
  • In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International (U.S. 2014), we obtained a unanimous Supreme Court victory holding that Alice Corporation’s financial service software patent was patent-ineligible because it was drawn to the abstract idea of intermediated settlement.
  • In Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership (U.S. 2011), we represented Microsoft in an important Supreme Court case setting the standard for providing patent invalidity as an affirmative defense.
  • In BNSF Railway v. Tyrrell (U.S. 2017), we secured an 8-1 decision for BNSF that established that a state may not exercise general personal jurisdiction over a railroad simply because the railroad does business in that state.
  • In Daimler AG v. Bauman (U.S. 2014), we won a unanimous judgment for Daimler that the U.S. Constitution prohibits a U.S. court from exercising general personal jurisdiction over a non-U.S. corporation with no employees or facilities in the United States.
  • In Opati v. Sudan (U.S. 2020), we secured a unanimous ruling that victims of terrorist attacks and their families may obtain punitive damages under federal law for acts of terrorism predating 2008.
  • In Bank Markazi v. Peterson (U.S. 2016), we persuaded the Supreme Court to uphold and enforce a federal statute making certain sovereign assets available for attachment by victims of terrorism.
  • In Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. (U.S. 2014), we obtained a ruling that a foreign sovereign’s extraterritorial assets are not immune from discovery under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
  • In Crystallex v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (3rd Cir. 2019), we won a victory in the Third Circuit holding that the assets of Venezuela’s state-owned petroleum company are subject to attachment.
  • In Harper v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. (3d Cir. 2021), we secured vacatur of a denial of a motion to compel arbitration and persuaded the court to adopt a new framework requiring courts to consider state-law grounds for compelling arbitration before ordering discovery under Section 1 of the FAA.
  • In Capriole v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (9th Cir. 2021), we obtained a decision that rideshare drivers are not a class of transportation workers exempt from the FAA under Section 1. This followed on the heels of In re Grice (9th Cir. 2020), in which we defeated a petition for mandamus on the same basis.
  • In Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc. (U.S. 2019), we secured a unanimous decision that the Copyright Act permits the prevailing party to recoup only a limited subset of the costs of the prevailing party.
  • In Wisconsin Central, Ltd. v. United States (U.S. 2018), we convinced the Supreme Court that stock options are not “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act of 1937 because they are not “money remuneration” within the meaning of the statute.

RECENT PUBLICATIONS

Gibson Dunn Promotes 37 Lawyers to Partnership

-November 15, 2022

Webcast: Nationwide Injunctions and the Practice of Forum Shopping

-November 15, 2022

Third Quarter 2022 Update on Class Actions

-October 31, 2022

The National Law Journal Names Gibson Dunn to 2022 Appellate Hot List

-October 21, 2022

Benchmark Litigation US 2023 Gives Top Marks to Gibson Dunn

-October 6, 2022

The Roberts Court’s Continued Protection of Religious Liberty

-October 4, 2022

The 2022 Term Was a Mixed Bag for Arbitration

-October 4, 2022

U.S. Supreme Court Round-Up (September 2022)

-September 28, 2022

Class Actions to Reshape the Litigation Landscape in Europe in 2023

-August 23, 2022

California Supreme Court Holds That Seller’s Promotional Statements About Controversial Album Are Commercial Speech Not Subject To Full First Amendment Protection

-August 19, 2022

Former Assistant to the Solicitor General Jonathan Bond Rejoins Gibson Dunn in Washington, D.C.

-August 15, 2022

Theodore B. Olson Will Serve on ABA’s Law, Society and the Judiciary Task Force

-August 9, 2022

Appeals 2022: United Kingdom

-August 4, 2022

Congress Should Codify Same-Sex Marriage

-August 4, 2022

Second Quarter 2022 Update on Class Actions

-July 28, 2022

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Holds That Scheme Liability After Lorenzo Requires Conduct Beyond Misstatements and Omissions

-July 20, 2022

Supreme Court Round-Up (July 2022)

-July 11, 2022

California Supreme Court Holds Employee May Sue Staffing Agency’s Client Even After Settling Same Claims Against Agency

-July 1, 2022

Supreme Court Upholds Limits On Environmental Protection Agency’s Authority To Shift Sources Of Energy Production

-June 30, 2022

Gibson Dunn Ranked in 2022 U.S. Legal 500

-June 22, 2022

Supreme Court Holds That The Federal Arbitration Act Requires Enforcement Of Agreements To Arbitrate Individual Claims Under California’s Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act

-June 15, 2022

Supreme Court Holds That Parties To Private Foreign Or International Arbitrations Cannot Seek Discovery Assistance From U.S. Courts

-June 13, 2022

Supreme Court Holds That Airline Cargo Loaders Are Exempt From The Federal Arbitration Act

-June 6, 2022

Gibson Dunn Earns 101 Top-Tier Rankings in Chambers USA 2022

-June 1, 2022

Supreme Court Holds Prejudice Not Required To Show Party Waived Right to Arbitrate

-May 23, 2022

Julian W. Poon Inducted into the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers

-May 3, 2022

First Quarter 2022 Update on Class Actions

-April 28, 2022

Supreme Court Holds That Damages For Emotional Distress Are Categorically Unavailable In Discrimination Actions Against Recipients Of Federal Financial Assistance

-April 28, 2022

Supreme Court Holds That Late Petitions For Review Of IRS Collection Due Process Determinations Are Subject To Equitable Tolling

-April 21, 2022

Supreme Court Holds That Regulation Applying Different Rules To Off-Premises Advertisements Is Content Neutral

-April 21, 2022

Gibson Dunn Appoints Thomas Dupree and Julian Poon to Join Allyson Ho as Co-Chairs of the Appellate and Constitutional Law Practice Group

-April 13, 2022

Ninth Circuit Issues Important En Banc Opinion Regarding Class Certification Issues

-April 11, 2022

Supreme Court Limits Federal Jurisdiction To Confirm Or Vacate Arbitral Awards

-March 31, 2022

Benchmark Litigation Names Gibson Dunn as East Coast Appellate Firm of the Year

-March 25, 2022

New York Court of Appeals Rules That Interactive Fantasy Sports Contests Do Not Constitute Gambling Under State Constitution

-March 25, 2022

Supreme Court Holds That A Mistake Of Law Can Excuse An Inaccurate Copyright Registration

-February 24, 2022

California Supreme Court Adopts New Standard for Whistleblower Retaliation Claims

-January 28, 2022

Year-End and Fourth Quarter 2021 Update on Class Actions

-January 27, 2022

2020/2021 Federal Circuit Year in Review

-January 27, 2022

Supreme Court Holds That Investor Choice Does Not Categorically Preclude ERISA Claims For Breach Of Fiduciary Duty

-January 24, 2022

Gibson Dunn Named a 2021 Firm of the Year

-January 19, 2022

Supreme Court Stays OSHA Vaccine-Or-Testing Mandate

-January 13, 2022

Webcast: Supreme Court Roundup: 2020-2021 Terms

-January 13, 2022

The Two Teds – Episode 6 – The Supreme Court’s Current Term

-December 21, 2021

New York Court of Appeals Round-Up & Preview

-December 20, 2021

Supreme Court Round-Up (November 2021)

-November 30, 2021

Gibson Dunn Promotes 27 Lawyers to Partnership

-November 4, 2021

Best Lawyers® Names Gibson Dunn Appellate Law Firm of the Year for 2022

-November 4, 2021

Third Quarter 2021 Update on Class Actions

-November 2, 2021

Richard Birns and Theodore Olson Named Sports Law Power Players

-October 29, 2021

The National Law Journal Names Gibson Dunn to 2021 Appellate Hot List

-October 21, 2021

Who’s Who Legal 2021 Recognizes Eight Gibson Dunn Partners in Commercial Litigation

-October 19, 2021

The Two Teds – Episode 5 – DACA, Dreamers and Immigration

-October 13, 2021

Benchmark Litigation US 2022 Gives Top Marks to Gibson Dunn

-October 13, 2021

Gibson Dunn Named Patent Litigation Firm of the Year by LMG Life Sciences

-September 23, 2021

California Supreme Court Reinforces Strong Presumption Against Liability for Companies Hiring Independent Contractors Based on Injuries to Contract Workers

-September 10, 2021

Federal Circuit Update (August 2021)

-September 8, 2021

Randy Mastro and Akiva Shapiro Named Litigators of the Week

-August 23, 2021

Second Quarter 2021 Update on Class Actions

-August 23, 2021

Supreme Court Enjoins Enforcement of New York State’s Eviction Moratorium

-August 13, 2021

Alice at Six: Patent Eligibility Comes of Age

-August 4, 2021

Federal Circuit Update (July 2021)

-August 2, 2021

Supreme Court Round-Up (July 2021)

-July 9, 2021

Federal Circuit Update (June 2021)

-July 6, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That California’s Donor Disclosure Law Violates The First Amendment

-July 1, 2021

The Two Teds – Episode 4 – Marriage Equality

-June 30, 2021

Supreme Court Upholds, But Limits, The Doctrine Of Patent Assignor Estoppel

-June 29, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That Private Parties Can Sue States To Seize State Property Along Federally Approved Pipeline Routes

-June 29, 2021

Supreme Court Upholds Broad Eligibility For Small Refineries Seeking Hardship Exemptions From Compliance With The EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standards

-June 25, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That Article III Requires All Class Members To Prove An Injury In Fact To Recover Damages

-June 25, 2021

Supreme Court Holds Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Structure Unconstitutional; Remands For Further Proceedings On Appropriate Remedy

-June 23, 2021

New York Court of Appeals Adds Two New Judges

-June 21, 2021

Supreme Court Tells Second Circuit To Clarify Securities Class Certification Ruling, And Holds That Defendants Have The Burden Of Persuasion In Rebutting The Basic Presumption

-June 21, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That Sherman Act Bars NCAA From Limiting Education-Related Benefits For Student-Athletes

-June 21, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That The Constitution Requires Administrative Review of PTAB Decisions

-June 21, 2021

Supreme Court Limits Extraterritorial Reach Of The Alien Tort Statute

-June 17, 2021

Supreme Court Rejects A Challenge To The Affordable Care Act’s Individual Mandate Because Plaintiffs Have No Standing

-June 17, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That The First Amendment Prohibits Philadelphia From Requiring Catholic Foster-Placement Agency To Certify Same-Sex Couples As Foster Parents

-June 17, 2021

Webcast: The Supreme Court’s Omnicare Decision: A Key Tool for Defending Securities Litigation Brought Against Life Sciences Companies

-June 16, 2021

New York Court of Appeals Clarifies Reach of New York Consumer Protection Statute

-June 9, 2021

Federal Circuit Update (May 2021)

-June 8, 2021

Supreme Court Narrows Scope Of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Holding It Does Not Prohibit Accessing Otherwise Available Information For An Improper Purpose

-June 3, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That Only Superfund-Specific Settlements Can Trigger Contribution Under CERCLA Section 113(f)(3)(B)

-May 25, 2021

Gibson Dunn Earns 94 Top-Tier Rankings in Chambers USA 2021

-May 20, 2021

Supreme Court Confirms That Appellate Courts Have Broad Authority To Review Entirety Of Appealable Remand Orders

-May 17, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That Anti-Injunction Act Does Not Bar Pre-Enforcement Challenges To Reporting Mandates Backed By Both Tax Penalties And Criminal Punishment

-May 17, 2021

Appeals 2021: United States

-May 6, 2021

Federal Circuit Update (April 2021)

-May 3, 2021

Supreme Court Restricts Power Of The Federal Trade Commission To Seek Monetary Relief In Courts

-April 22, 2021

The Two Teds – Episode 3 – The First Amendment

-April 19, 2021

Gibson Dunn Wins Six Awards at 2021 Benchmark Litigation US Awards Ceremony

-April 5, 2021

Thomas Dupree Named Litigator of the Week

-April 5, 2021

Federal Circuit Update (March 2021)

-April 5, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That Google’s Use Of Oracle’s Java Software Interface Is Fair Use

-April 5, 2021

Supreme Court Holds That FCC Permissibly Relaxed Media Ownership Limits

-April 1, 2021

Supreme Court Declines To Extend Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s Coverage Of Automatic Telephone Dialing Systems

-April 1, 2021

The Two Teds – Episode 2 – Bush v Gore and Election Litigation

-March 18, 2021

The Two Teds – Episode 1 – Opening Statements

-March 17, 2021

Federal Circuit Update (February 2021)

-March 3, 2021

The Case of the Century – The French Administrative Court Issues a Groundbreaking Ruling on State Responsibility for Climate Change

-February 26, 2021