Appellate and Constitutional Law



Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher is renowned for its award-winning Appellate and Constitutional Law Practice Group, one of the largest and most experienced appellate practices in the nation. Each year, we present arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States, all 13 federal courts of appeals, and state appellate courts throughout the country. We work closely with trial teams to preserve arguments and develop a winning litigation strategy. When the occasion calls for it, we also develop novel or complex legal theories, sometimes long before the suit is filed. No firm has a stronger record of appellate success.

Renowned U.S. Supreme Court Advocacy

Gibson Dunn has an unmatched record of success representing clients before the Supreme Court of the United States. With its diverse team of Supreme Court practitioners, Gibson Dunn consistently litigates multiple Supreme Court cases each Term, among the most of any firm. We regularly achieve victory in the most challenging cases with the highest stakes.

  • Gibson Dunn lawyers have argued nearly 160 cases before the Supreme Court, with eleven current attorneys having argued at the Court.
  • We build Supreme Court cases from the ground up, working hand-in-hand with trial attorneys to develop a strong record for appellate review and position each case for Supreme Court review if necessary.
  • Our Supreme Court victories have been some of the biggest and most consequential in history:
    • Bush v. Gore, which resolved Florida’s recount dispute in the 2000 presidential election.
    • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down limits on corporate independent expenditures under the First Amendment.
    • Hollingsworth v. Perry, which defeated an effort by the proponents of California’s Proposition 8 to defend the proposition in court.
    • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, the most important Supreme Court decision in decades on the limits of certifying claims for class action treatment.
    • Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, which reformed the law of patent eligibility.
    • National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, which struck down presidential appointments made while the Senate was in pro forma session.
    • Daimler AG v. Bauman, which recognized important due process limits on courts’ exercise of personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.
    • Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, which struck down prohibitions on the legalization of sports wagering.
    • Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission, which held that SEC administrative law judges are “Officers of the United States” who must be appointed consistent with the Appointments Clause.
    • Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, which struck down DHS’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Unparalleled Federal and State Appellate Advocacy

In addition to our Supreme Court practice, Gibson Dunn attorneys handle a wide range of appellate matters in the federal courts of appeals and the state appellate courts.

  • Each year, we brief and argue federal appeals in every regional circuit, the D.C. Circuit, the Federal Circuit, and dozens of state courts of appeals—averaging one appeal approximately every three business days.
  • Our appellate attorneys regularly work alongside the trial team to anticipate legal issues and position our clients for victory on appeal even while the case remains in the trial court. This comprehensive approach to litigation permits us to leverage the wide expertise of lawyers across all of Gibson Dunn’s diverse practices.
  • When government action is at issue, our appellate lawyers work with the firm’s nationally recognized Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Group. We have achieved significant victories in some of the biggest administrative proceedings across the federal government, including the FCC’s Net Neutrality proceeding and numerous SEC rules regulating the national securities exchanges.

Select Accolades

  • Benchmark Litigation US 2022 ranked Gibson Dunn’s Appellate practice Tier 1 nationally, and named the firm its 2022 East Coast Appellate Firm of the Year.
  • U.S. News – Best Lawyers® named Gibson Dunn the 2022 “Law Firm of the Year” for Appellate Practice in its “Best Law Firms” survey. Only one law firm is recognized in each national practice area.
  • The American Lawyer named Gibson Dunn a Finalist in its 2021 Litigation Department of the Year competition, noting that “when news breaks and the pressure rises, clients call Gibson Dunn’s litigators to regain control.” This award follows our unprecedented four wins in this biennial competition. Ted Boutrous also was named 2020 Litigator of the Year, Grand Prize, recognizing that he was “at the center of some of the nation’s most closely watched cases on the First Amendment, the rule of law, privacy and more.”
  • Law360 named Gibson Dunn a 2021 Appellate Group of the Year, for the third year in a row, marking the firm’s tenth appearance on its annual list of top appellate groups since 2011.
  • Chambers USA 2022 ranked Gibson Dunn in Tier 1 nationwide for 37 practice groups, including Appellate Law.
  • The National Law Journal named Gibson Dunn to its 2021 Appellate Hot List, which “highlights law firms that have handled exemplary appellate matters.”
  • The American Lawyer ranked Gibson Dunn on its 2021 A-List, its most prestigious annual survey of the most elite law firms in the United States.

Our Team

Gibson Dunn has more than 200 lawyers who practice appellate and constitutional law in our offices across the United States, and is home to more than 240 attorneys who served as law clerks in the federal and state appellate courts, including more than 25 who clerked at the U.S. Supreme Court. In addition, one of our lawyers held the prestigious Bristow Fellowship awarded by the U.S. Solicitor General.

Allyson Ho, Thomas H. Dupree, Jr. and Julian W. Poon are the Chairs of the Appellate Practice Group. All are widely regarded as among the nation’s most accomplished appellate litigators. Ms. Ho has presented over 70 oral arguments in federal and state courts nationwide, including multiple high-stakes cases on behalf of business before the U.S. Supreme Court. She also has a distinguished record of experience at the highest levels of the federal government. Mr. Dupree has briefed and argued several cases in the Supreme Court of the United States and more than 80 cases in the federal courts of appeals. He previously served as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, overseeing more than 900 lawyers. Mr. Poon appears regularly before federal and state appellate courts in California, including the Ninth Circuit, the California Supreme Court, and the California Court of Appeal. He has been recognized as an outstanding appellate lawyer by Chambers and a “Litigation Star” by Benchmark Litigation.

Three of our partners served in the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States, the office charged with representing the United States before the U.S. Supreme Court:

  • Theodore Olson served as U.S. Solicitor General from 2001 to 2004. Between his government service and private practice, Mr. Olson has argued 65 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • Miguel Estrada served as Assistant to the Solicitor General from 1992 to 1997. Between his government service and private practice, Mr. Estrada has argued 24 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • Thomas G. Hungar served as Deputy Solicitor General from 2003 to 2008, and as Assistant to the Solicitor General from 1992 to 1994. He was also General Counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives from 2016 to 2019. Between his government service and private practice, Mr. Hungar has argued 26 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.

In addition, numerous other partners have held high-ranking government positions, including Helgi Walker and Elizabeth Papez.

Our attorneys have been honored as the “Litigator of the Week” or “Litigator of the Year” by The American Lawyer numerous times:

  • In June 2019, Matt McGill was awarded Litigator of the Week for his successful challenge to the Department of Justice’s reinterpretation of interstate gambling statute.
  • In August 2018, Miguel Estrada and Robert Weigel were recognized as Litigators of the Week for their success in seeking to attach assets of Venezuela to satisfy an arbitration award (in a decision that was later upheld by the Third Circuit).
  • In November 2018, Ted Olson and Ted Boutrous were awarded Litigators of the Week for their successful challenge to the White House’s revocation of the press pass of CNN’s Jim Acosta. Ted Boutrous was recognized again in September 2019 for a similar victory involving Playboy White House reporter Brian Karem.
  • In May 2018, Ted Olson was recognized as Litigator of the Week for his victory in the Supreme Court overturning the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992.
  • In 2014, Miguel Estrada was awarded Litigator of the Year for, among other things, his groundbreaking win before the Supreme Court in NLRB v. Noel Canning.


  • In FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project (U.S. 2021), we successfully represented industry members in defending the FCC’s decision to repeal or modify three of its media ownership rules.
  • In Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California (U.S. 2020), we secured a decision vacating the Trump administration’s effort to repeal the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy and protecting over a million participants in the program from deportation and revocation of work authorization.
  • In Lucia v. SEC (U.S. 2018), we persuaded the Supreme Court that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s administrative law judges are “Officers of the United States” who must be appointed in conformity with the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
  • In three cases named The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC v. SEC (D.C. Cir. 2020), we secured rulings vacating the SEC’s Transaction Fee Pilot program and holding that Section 19(d) of the Securities Exchange Act does not authorize the SEC to review generally applicable fee rules filed by exchanges.
  • In Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles (U.S. 2013), we secured a unanimous Supreme Court decision for Standard Fire enforcing the Class Action Fairness Act.
  • In Comcast Corp. v. Behrend (U.S. 2013), we secured a victory for Comcast when the Supreme Court reversed an order certifying a class of more than two million Comcast subscribers and placed new limits on classwide damages.
  • In Wal-Mart v. Dukes (U.S. 2011), we obtained a landmark victory for the world’s largest retailer when the Supreme Court unanimously reversed class certification of the biggest employment discrimination class in history.
  • In Magadia v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (9th Cir. 2021), we obtained reversal of an over‑$100 million judgment, defeating the certified class claims in their entirety.
  • In Forby v. One Technologies, L.P., (5th Cir. 2021), we secured dismissal of a putative class action under the Credit Repair Organizations Act against a leading provider of credit-monitoring services.
  • In Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (U.S. 2018), we convinced the Supreme Court to invalidate federal limits on sports gambling as inconsistent with federalism and anticommandeering principles.
  • In NLRB v. Noel Canning (U.S. 2014), on behalf of Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and 44 other U.S. Senators, we persuaded the Supreme Court to unanimously affirm a landmark separation-of-powers decision that held unconstitutional three 2012 appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.
  • In Hollingsworth v. Perry (U.S. 2013), Gibson Dunn obtained a historic marriage equality victory that left intact the district court’s broad injunction against the enforcement of California Proposition 8, an amendment to the California Constitution restricting marriage in the state to between one man and one woman.
  • In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (U.S. 2010), Gibson Dunn obtained a groundbreaking campaign finance victory that established the First Amendment rights of corporations to engage in political speech.
  • In Bush v. Gore (U.S. 2000), and Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board (U.S. 2000), Gibson Dunn successfully served as lead counsel for candidate George W. Bush in federal court litigation stemming from the disputed ballot counting in Florida during the 2000 U.S. presidential election, prevailing on equal protection grounds.
  • In People v., Inc. (N.Y. App. Div. 2022), we obtained an appellate victory based on federal labor‑law preemption that resulted in the complete dismissal of a state enforcement action alleging violation of state anti-retaliation laws.
  • In Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. Nevils (U.S. 2017), we obtained a victory for Coventry when the Supreme Court unanimously held that the Federal Employee Health Benefits Act preempts state laws that purport to regulate the administration of federal health benefits.
  • In Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust (U.S. 2016), we obtained a Supreme Court ruling in favor of our client, holding that Puerto Rico’s Public Corporation Debt and Recovery Act, which purported to create a binding bankruptcy-like debt-restructuring regime for the Commonwealth’s highly indebted public entities, was preempted by federal law.
  • In Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila (U.S. 2004), we won a landmark victory for Aetna and CIGNA when the Supreme Court unanimously held that the Employee Retirement Insurance Security Act of 1974 completely preempts state-law actions by participants and beneficiaries of employee health benefit plans for matters relating to the plans’ coverage decision.
  • In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International (U.S. 2014), we obtained a unanimous Supreme Court victory holding that Alice Corporation’s financial service software patent was patent-ineligible because it was drawn to the abstract idea of intermediated settlement.
  • In Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership (U.S. 2011), we represented Microsoft in an important Supreme Court case setting the standard for providing patent invalidity as an affirmative defense.
  • In BNSF Railway v. Tyrrell (U.S. 2017), we secured an 8-1 decision for BNSF that established that a state may not exercise general personal jurisdiction over a railroad simply because the railroad does business in that state.
  • In Daimler AG v. Bauman (U.S. 2014), we won a unanimous judgment for Daimler that the U.S. Constitution prohibits a U.S. court from exercising general personal jurisdiction over a non-U.S. corporation with no employees or facilities in the United States.
  • In Opati v. Sudan (U.S. 2020), we secured a unanimous ruling that victims of terrorist attacks and their families may obtain punitive damages under federal law for acts of terrorism predating 2008.
  • In Bank Markazi v. Peterson (U.S. 2016), we persuaded the Supreme Court to uphold and enforce a federal statute making certain sovereign assets available for attachment by victims of terrorism.
  • In Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. (U.S. 2014), we obtained a ruling that a foreign sovereign’s extraterritorial assets are not immune from discovery under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
  • In Crystallex v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (3rd Cir. 2019), we won a victory in the Third Circuit holding that the assets of Venezuela’s state-owned petroleum company are subject to attachment.
  • In Harper v. Services, Inc. (3d Cir. 2021), we secured vacatur of a denial of a motion to compel arbitration and persuaded the court to adopt a new framework requiring courts to consider state-law grounds for compelling arbitration before ordering discovery under Section 1 of the FAA.
  • In Capriole v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (9th Cir. 2021), we obtained a decision that rideshare drivers are not a class of transportation workers exempt from the FAA under Section 1. This followed on the heels of In re Grice (9th Cir. 2020), in which we defeated a petition for mandamus on the same basis.
  • In Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc. (U.S. 2019), we secured a unanimous decision that the Copyright Act permits the prevailing party to recoup only a limited subset of the costs of the prevailing party.
  • In Wisconsin Central, Ltd. v. United States (U.S. 2018), we convinced the Supreme Court that stock options are not “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act of 1937 because they are not “money remuneration” within the meaning of the statute.


Federal Circuit Update (June 2024)

-July 12, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That Six-Year Limitations Period For Administrative Procedure Act Claims Runs From The Plaintiff’s Injury, Not The Rule’s Promulgation

-July 1, 2024

Fifth Circuit Finds SEC’s “About-Face” On Proxy-Firm Disclosure Rule Arbitrary And Capricious

-July 1, 2024

Supreme Court Limits Scope Of Sarbanes-Oxley’s Prohibition On Obstructing Official Proceedings

-June 28, 2024

Supreme Court Overrules Chevron, Sharply Limiting Judicial Deference To Agencies’ Statutory Interpretation

-June 28, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That The Eighth Amendment Does Not Prevent Enforcement Of Camping Regulations On Public Property

-June 28, 2024

Supreme Court Grants Stay Suspending EPA’s “Good Neighbor” Emissions-Regulation Plan

-June 27, 2024

Supreme Court Holds The Seventh Amendment Entitles A Defendant To A Jury Trial When The SEC Seeks Civil Penalties For Securities Fraud

-June 27, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That Federal Bribery Law Applies Only To Quid Pro Quo Exchanges And Does Not Extend To After-the-Fact “Gratuities”

-June 26, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That 2017 Mandatory Repatriation Tax Does Not Violate The Sixteenth Amendment

-June 20, 2024

California Supreme Court Holds That An Insured Can Access Its First-Level Excess Policy After Exhausting Only The Underlying Primary Insurance For That Policy Period

-June 18, 2024

Supreme Court Rejects Lower Standard For Preliminary Injunctions Sought By The National Labor Relations Board

-June 13, 2024

Supreme Court Upholds Prohibition On Registration Of Trademarks That Incorporate Personal Names Without Consent

-June 13, 2024

Gibson Dunn Ranked in 2024 U.S. Legal 500

-June 12, 2024

Federal Circuit Update (May 2024)

-June 7, 2024

Gibson Dunn Earns 112 Top-Tier Rankings in Chambers USA 2024

-June 6, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That A Corporation’s Life Insurance Proceeds Used To Redeem A Decedent’s Shares Must Be Included In Federal Estate Tax Calculation

-June 6, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That Insurers With Financial Responsibility For Bankruptcy Claims May Be Heard In Reorganization Proceedings

-June 6, 2024

Petitioners and AG Bonta Ask California Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Death Penalty

-May 31, 2024

Supreme Court Announces Standard For Determining Whether Federal Law Preempts State Laws Regulating National Banks

-May 30, 2024

The Two Teds – Episode 8 – Media Relations

-May 28, 2024

Texas Supreme Court Holds Courts Cannot Certify Issue Classes Unless Underlying Claim Is Certifiable

-May 24, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That Courts Must Decide Conflict Between Arbitration Delegation Clause And Later Forum Selection Clause

-May 23, 2024

California Supreme Court Holds That COVID-19 Does Not Create “Direct Physical Loss Or Damage” To Insured Property

-May 23, 2024

Supreme Court Holds CFPB’s Funding Structure Constitutional

-May 16, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That The Federal Arbitration Act Requires Courts To Stay Cases That Are Subject To Arbitration

-May 16, 2024

U.S. Supreme Court Round-Up (May 2024)

-May 15, 2024

Federal Circuit Update (April 2024)

-May 10, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That Copyright Act Has No Time Limit For Damages But Declines To Decide When Infringement Claims Are Timely

-May 9, 2024

First Quarter 2024 Update on Class Actions

-May 6, 2024

California Supreme Court Holds That Employers Have A Good-Faith Defense To Statutory Penalties For Wage-Statement Violations

-May 6, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That A Title VII Plaintiff Challenging A Work Transfer Need Not Show “Significant” Harm

-April 17, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That Legislatively Mandated Development Exactions Can Be Unconstitutional Takings

-April 12, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That The Federal Arbitration Act’s Exemption For Transportation Workers Is Not Limited To Workers In The Transportation Industry

-April 12, 2024

Supreme Court Holds That Pure Omissions Cannot Support A Cause Of Action Under Rule 10b-5(b)

-April 12, 2024

Texas Supreme Court Holds Arbitrator Must Decide Questions Of Arbitrability Absent Evidence That Delegation Clause Is Itself Unconscionable

-April 9, 2024

Federal Circuit Update (March 2024)

-April 5, 2024

New York Court of Appeals Permits Challenge to New York City’s Property Tax System

-April 1, 2024

Forbes Names Three Gibson Dunn Partners Among America’s Top 200 Lawyers 2024

-March 26, 2024

The Two-Prong Test to Distinguish Official Versus Private Speech in the Social Media Context

-March 26, 2024

Texas Supreme Court Seeks Public Comment on Proposed Rules for New Business Court and 15th Court of Appeals

-March 22, 2024

The Corporate Transparency Act Declared Unconstitutional: What It Means for You

-March 18, 2024

Daily Journal Names Kevin Rosen Among California’s Top Professional Responsibility Lawyers 2024

-March 6, 2024

Federal Circuit Update (February 2024)

-March 5, 2024

Julian Poon Elected to American Academy of Appellate Lawyers

-February 29, 2024

Texas Supreme Court Allows Claimant to Sue Insurers Directly After Settlement, But Holds Settlement Agreement Does Not Bind Insurers

-February 27, 2024

Two Gibson Dunn Cases Named Top Verdicts of 2023

-February 26, 2024

Webcast: Today’s Key First Amendment Battles. Who Gets to Say It and Who Gets to Stop It?

-February 14, 2024

Federal Circuit Update (January 2024)

-February 7, 2024

Law360 Names Gibson Dunn Among its 2023 Appellate Practice Groups of the Year

-February 1, 2024

Fourth Quarter 2023 Update on Class Actions

-January 31, 2024

Gibson Dunn Named a 2023 Firm of the Year

-January 22, 2024

Texas Supreme Court Holds Courts Cannot Create New Duties When Existing Duty Rules Apply

-January 22, 2024

California Supreme Court Holds That Trial Courts May Not Strike PAGA Claims as Unmanageable, But May Limit the Evidence a Plaintiff Can Present at Trial

-January 18, 2024

Webcasts: Gibson Dunn’s Annual California MCLE Blitz – 2024

-January 16, 2024

Federal Circuit Update (December 2023)

-January 10, 2024

Emerging Issues and Trends in Class Actions: Three Splits and Four Issues on the Horizon for 2024

-December 28, 2023

Federal Circuit Update (November 2023)

-December 11, 2023

Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Confirms That No Leave Is Required for Securities and Futures Commission to Serve a Writ Out of Jurisdiction

-November 14, 2023

Federal Circuit Update (October 2023)

-November 6, 2023

Best Law Firms® Names Gibson Dunn “Law Firm of the Year” for 2024 in Appellate Practice and in Mergers and Acquisitions Law

-November 2, 2023

Third Quarter 2023 Update on Class Actions

-November 1, 2023

U.S. Supreme Court Round-Up (October 2023)

-October 4, 2023

Federal Circuit Update (September 2023)

-October 3, 2023

The National Law Journal Names Gibson Dunn to 2023 Appellate Hot List

-September 8, 2023

Federal Circuit Update (August 2023)

-September 6, 2023

How ‘Purely Legal’ Issues Ruling Applies To Rule 12 Motions

-August 31, 2023

11 Gibson Dunn Lawyers Named Lawyers of the Year for 2024

-August 17, 2023

Federal Circuit Update (July 2023)

-August 7, 2023

Second Quarter 2023 Update on Class Actions

-August 2, 2023

California Supreme Court Holds Private Universities Do Not Need To Permit Cross Examination Of Witnesses In Administrative Disciplinary Proceedings

-August 1, 2023

Texas Creates New Business Court

-July 25, 2023

California Supreme Court Holds Organizational Plaintiffs Have Standing To Sue Under UCL When They Incur Costs In Responding To Allegedly Unfair Competition

-July 20, 2023

U.S. Supreme Court Round-Up (July 2023)

-July 20, 2023

Attorneys General of 13 States Issue Warning to Fortune 100 Companies Regarding Their Diversity and Inclusion Programs in Wake of Supreme Court’s Decision Overturning Affirmative Action in Higher Education

-July 18, 2023

California Supreme Court Holds Plaintiffs Compelled To Arbitrate Individual PAGA Claims Can Still Have Standing To Litigate Non-Individual PAGA Claims

-July 18, 2023

California Supreme Court Holds Employers Have No Duty Of Care To Prevent The Spread Of COVID-19 To Employees’ Households

-July 6, 2023

Federal Circuit Update (June 2023)

-July 6, 2023

Supreme Court Holds Biden Administration’s Mass Student Loan-Cancellation Program Unlawful

-June 30, 2023

Supreme Court Holds That U.S. Trademark Infringement Claims Must Be Based On Domestic Use In Commerce

-June 29, 2023

Supreme Court Clarifies Standard For Assessing Whether A Religious Accommodation Would Result In An “Undue Hardship”

-June 29, 2023

The Supreme Court Limits The Use Of Race In College Admissions: Potential Impact On Workplace Diversity Programs

-June 29, 2023

Law360 Names Brad Hubbard a 2023 Appellate Rising Star

-June 28, 2023

Supreme Court Holds That Due Process Permits A State To Require Registered Businesses To Consent To General Jurisdiction

-June 27, 2023

Gibson Dunn Ranked in 2023 U.S. Legal 500

-June 23, 2023

Supreme Court Holds That Appealing The Denial Of A Motion To Compel Arbitration Automatically Stays District Court Proceedings

-June 23, 2023

‘Ethics’ and the Supreme Court’s Independence

-June 22, 2023

Supreme Court Holds That Foreign Plaintiffs Can Pursue Civil RICO Claims If They Suffered An Injury That Arose In The United States

-June 22, 2023

Law360 Names Five Gibson Dunn Lawyers as 2023 Rising Stars

-June 20, 2023

Supreme Court Upholds The Federal Government’s Broad Authority To Dismiss False Claims Act Lawsuits After It Has Intervened

-June 16, 2023

The Two Teds – Episode 7 – How to Argue Before the U.S. Supreme Court

-June 15, 2023

Webcast: Recent Developments at the New York Court of Appeals

-June 14, 2023

Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of First Amendment Defenses To Use Of Trademarks In “Parody” Products

-June 8, 2023

Federal Circuit Update (May 2023)

-June 6, 2023

Supreme Court Holds That False Claims Act Scienter Turns On Defendant’s Knowledge And Subjective Beliefs

-June 2, 2023

Gibson Dunn Earns 108 Top-Tier Rankings in Chambers USA 2023

-June 1, 2023

Supreme Court Holds All Plaintiffs Suing Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 Must Show They Bought Registered Shares

-June 1, 2023

Supreme Court Holds That The National Labor Relations Act Does Not Preempt Tort Claims Against Union For Destruction Of Property

-June 1, 2023

Supreme Court Adopts “Continuous Surface Connection” Test For Whether Wetlands Are Covered By The Clean Water Act

-May 25, 2023

California Supreme Court Holds That Whistleblower Statute Protects Employees Who Disclose Illegal Conduct Already Known To The Recipient

-May 22, 2023

Supreme Court Rejects Antibody Drug Patent, Clarifies Patent “Enablement” Requirement

-May 18, 2023

Supreme Court Holds New Meaning Alone Is Not Sufficient For The Fair Use Defense

-May 18, 2023

Supreme Court Rejects Allegations That Social-Media Companies Did Not Do “Enough” To Block Terrorist Content But Declines To Address Scope Of Section 230

-May 18, 2023

Supreme Court Rejects Dormant Commerce Clause Challenge To California Law Restricting Sale Of Pork Based On Conditions In Which Pigs Are Raised

-May 11, 2023

Supreme Court Rejects “Right-to-Control” Theory And Reaffirms That The Federal Fraud Statutes Reach Only Traditional Property Interests

-May 11, 2023

Supreme Court Overturns Wire Fraud Conviction of Private Citizen Under Honest-Services Theory After Holding That The Jury Instructions Given Were Too Vague

-May 11, 2023

Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Upholds Dismissal of Bankruptcy Petition Where Debt Under Dispute Was Subject to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause

-May 10, 2023

First Quarter 2023 Update on Class Actions

-May 8, 2023