May 5, 2023
On May 3, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”), in a 3-to-2 vote, adopted amendments to the disclosure requirements relating to companies’ repurchases of their equity securities. The amendments will require companies to: (i) disclose daily repurchase data in a new table filed as an exhibit to Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, (ii) indicate by a check box whether any executives or directors traded in the company’s equity securities within four business days before or after the public announcement of the repurchase plan or program or the announcement of an increase of an existing share repurchase plan or program, (iii) provide narrative disclosure about the repurchase program, including its objectives and rationale, in the filing, and (iv) provide quarterly disclosure regarding the company’s adoption or termination of any Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements. The new amendments will invite enhanced scrutiny of companies’ share repurchase practices and rationales.
While reflecting a prescriptive and perhaps quixotic approach to a perceived potential for abuse that the SEC acknowledges is not present in many, or perhaps even most, share repurchases, the final rules reflect a significant paring back from the SEC’s initial proposal, which would have required daily reporting of repurchases on a next-day basis. The SEC also confirmed that companies that rely on recently amended Rule 10b5-1 will not be subject to a cooling-off period, any limitation on the use of multiple overlapping plans, any limitation on the use of single-trade plans or any disclosure regarding so-called “non-10b5-1 trading arrangements.” These changes reflect the SEC’s responsiveness to constructive and pragmatic comments received on its rule proposals, offering a sign of hope for other pending SEC rulemaking initiatives.
The 200+ page adopting release is available here and a Fact Sheet is available here. The final rules will become effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. For companies that file on domestic forms, the disclosure requirements will apply to Forms 10-K or 10-Q filed for the first full fiscal quarter beginning on or after October 1, 2023. For calendar year companies, this means that the new disclosures will first appear in their 2023 Form 10-K, showing any repurchases made (and disclosing any related Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements entered into or terminated) during the fourth quarter. Later effective dates apply for foreign private issuers (“FPIs”) and listed closed-end funds, but there are no delays for other categories such as for smaller reporting companies.
Set forth below is a summary of the amendments and some considerations for companies in connection with these SEC rule amendments.
Summary of Amendments
New Periodic Reporting Requirements for U.S. Companies. The amendments introduce the following new periodic reporting requirements:
As is currently the case, if a company’s repurchase plan or program was publicly announced, the disclosure also must state:
- the date each plan or program was announced,
- the dollar or share amount approved,
- the expiration date, if any, of the plan or program,
- each plan or program that has expired in the relevant period, and
- each plan or program that the company has determined to terminate prior to expiration, or under which the company does not intend to make further purchases.
New Periodic Reporting Requirements for Foreign Private Issuers and Listed Closed-End Funds. The amendments impose substantially similar requirements on FPI and listed closed-end funds as they do on domestic companies. The requirements that differ for FPIs and listed closed-end funds are described below:
Considerations and Next Steps
Expect interpretive issues and (hopefully) guidance. The SEC noted that companies can continue to rely on the Commission Staff’s existing “Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations” addressing whether certain transactions are covered by the issuer repurchase disclosure rules. Thus, for example, a company’s acquisition of shares that are tendered to pay the exercise price of an employee stock option will continue to be a reportable repurchase, whereas withholding shares to pay taxes on the option exercise or upon vesting of restricted stock units will not be. Nevertheless, as with any new set of regulations, companies should expect a number of interpretive questions to arise. For example, while the instructions to the checkbox requirement state that companies generally can rely on Section 16 filings in determining whether they need to check the box, it is unclear whether transactions that are exempt from Section 16 reporting, such as dividend reinvestments and 401(k) plan transactions, trigger the checkbox requirement. While the Division of Corporation Finance has continued to express its willingness to address questions arising under its rules, guidance on recently adopted rules has been slow and sparse. Therefore, companies should closely review the new disclosure requirements in the near term and assess whether there are questions on how the rules apply to their own particular repurchase practices, so that the issues can be carefully vetted with in-house and outside counsel.
Companies will need to carefully consider and appropriately revise disclosures regarding the “objectives or rationales” for share repurchases. The SEC emphasized that a company’s discussion of its objective or rationales for repurchases should not be “boilerplate.” Indeed, the rules contemplate that different objectives or rationales could apply to different repurchases reported in the same quarterly report. For example, repurchases under equity compensation plans will have a different rationale than open-market repurchases designed to return excess capital to shareholders. Thus, it will be necessary for companies to tailor and adjust their disclosures from time to time as appropriate. In this regard, the SEC’s adopting release provides some examples of the types of topics that may be included in such disclosures, such as discussing how repurchases fit within the company’s capital allocation plans, whether repurchases were driven by a view that the company’s stock was undervalued, or addressing the source of funds for repurchases (such as whether proceeds from the disposition of a business unit were utilized to fund repurchases). We expect that for many companies with ongoing repurchase programs designed to return excess capital to investors, these “objectives or rationale” disclosures may not vary from quarter-to-quarter. Nevertheless, companies should establish disclosure controls to ensure that such disclosures are reviewed and confirmed or adjusted as appropriate each quarter. In addition, companies will want to ensure that comments by their executives on earnings calls and at other venues regarding the company’s share repurchases are consistent with the disclosures in their Forms 10-Q and 10-K.
Companies should document their processes for implementing share repurchases. The insider trading rule amendments adopted by the SEC in December 2022 require companies to file as exhibits to their Form 10-K any insider trading policies and procedures applicable to purchases and sales of the company’s securities by the company. While the SEC Staff has informally indicated that this insider trading policy exhibit requirement applies to calendar year companies starting with their 2024 Form 10-Ks, the new share repurchase rules require companies to disclose the “process or criteria used to determine the amount of repurchases” starting with calendar year companies’ 2023
Form 10-K. Companies should therefore bear in mind these separate but related disclosure requirements as they prepare to describe their processes around share repurchases.
Companies should consider whether to establish policies or procedures relating to the purchase or sale of shares by officers and directors during the time that a company’s repurchase program is active. Many companies with active and ongoing share repurchase programs do not preclude sales by executives and directors while the companies’ repurchases are ongoing. We believe allowing insider transactions in this context is entirely appropriate, and view the potential for abuse in these situations as largely theoretical. Moreover, compliance with Rule 10b-18, which is a safe harbor designed to prevent issuer repurchases from pushing up a company’s stock price, should provide additional comfort that same-day insider sales and company repurchases are not designed to benefit insiders, as should the use of Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. However, with the advent of trade-day reporting by companies, companies should expect that there will be greater scrutiny by the SEC, shareholders, and the press of insider sales and company repurchases that occur on the same day. Therefore, to the extent they do not already do so, companies should monitor and keep track of their insiders’ open market transactions, whether pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans or otherwise, so that they can evaluate the risks of corporate actions or significant announcements that might be viewed as questionable in hindsight. Companies also may want to consider whether to develop policies or procedures addressing potential appearance issues that could arise if they are effecting relatively isolated or unusually large repurchases (other than pursuant to a company’s Rule 10b5-1 buyback plan) on the same day as significant sales by insiders, particularly if those sales are effected by the CEO or by executives who might be expected to be involved in managing the company’s repurchase program, such as the CFO.
Exhibit: Tabular Disclosure Format
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Use the checkbox to indicate if any officer or director reporting pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78p(a)), or for foreign private issuers as defined by Rule 3b-4(c) (§ 240.3b-4(c) of this chapter), any director or member of senior management who would be identified pursuant to Item 1 of Form 20-F (§ 249.220f of this chapter), purchased or sold shares or other units of the class of the issuer’s equity securities that are registered pursuant to section 12 of the Exchange Act and subject of a publicly announced plan or program within four (4) business days before or after the issuer’s announcement of such repurchase plan or program or the announcement of an increase of an existing share repurchase plan or program.
(a) Execution Date |
(b) Class of Shares (or Units) |
(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased |
(d) Average Price per Share (or Unit) |
(e) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
(f) Aggregate Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value of Shares or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
(g) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased on the Open Market |
(h) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased that are Intended to Qualify for the Safe Harbor in Rule 10b-18 |
(i) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased Pursuant to a Plan that is Intended to Satisfy the Affirmative Defense Conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[insert additional rows as necessary for each day on which a repurchase was executed] |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following Gibson Dunn attorneys assisted in preparing this update: Ronald O. Mueller, James J. Moloney, Maggie Valachovic, Nicholas Whetstone, and Chris Connelly.
Gibson Dunn lawyers are available to assist in addressing any questions you may have about these developments. To learn more about these issues, please contact the Gibson Dunn lawyer with whom you usually work, the authors, or any of the following leaders of the firm’s Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance or Capital Markets practice groups:
Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Group:
Elizabeth Ising – Washington, D.C. (+1 202-955-8287, eising@gibsondunn.com)
James J. Moloney – Orange County, CA (+1 949-451-4343, jmoloney@gibsondunn.com)
Lori Zyskowski – New York, NY (+1 212-351-2309, lzyskowski@gibsondunn.com)
Brian J. Lane – Washington, D.C. (+1 202-887-3646, blane@gibsondunn.com)
Ronald O. Mueller – Washington, D.C. (+1 202-955-8671, rmueller@gibsondunn.com)
Thomas J. Kim – Washington, D.C. (+1 202-887-3550, tkim@gibsondunn.com)
Michael A. Titera – Orange County, CA (+1 949-451-4365, mtitera@gibsondunn.com)
Aaron Briggs – San Francisco, CA (+1 415-393-8297, abriggs@gibsondunn.com)
Julia Lapitskaya – New York, NY (+1 212-351-2354, jlapitskaya@gibsondunn.com)
Capital Markets Group:
Andrew L. Fabens – New York (+1 212-351-4034, afabens@gibsondunn.com)
Hillary H. Holmes – Houston (+1 346-718-6602, hholmes@gibsondunn.com)
Stewart L. McDowell – San Francisco (+1 415-393-8322, smcdowell@gibsondunn.com)
Peter W. Wardle – Los Angeles (+1 213-229-7242, pwardle@gibsondunn.com)
© 2023 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Attorney Advertising: The enclosed materials have been prepared for general informational purposes only and are not intended as legal advice. Please note, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome