August 1, 2023
Decided July 31, 2023
Boermeester v. Carry, S263180
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court held that private universities do not need to provide students accused of misconduct with the right to cross examine accusers and other witnesses at live hearings during administrative disciplinary proceedings.
Background: The University of Southern California expelled student Matthew Boermeester after determining he violated USC’s policy against intimate partner violence. Boermeester filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate under Code of Civil Procedure 1094.5(b), alleging that he was deprived a “fair trial.” Specifically, he claimed that his common-law right to a fair procedure was violated when he was denied the right to attend a live hearing at which he or his attorney could directly cross examine his accuser and third-party witnesses.
The trial court disagreed with Boermeester and denied the petition. A divided Court of Appeal reversed, concluding that USC provided unfair procedures because USC did not provide Boermeester with the opportunity to cross examine critical witnesses at an in-person hearing.
Issue: The common-law right to fair procedure requires fair notice of the charges and a meaningful opportunity to be heard. Must private organizations provide in-person hearings with the right to cross examination in order to comply with the common-law right to a fair procedure?
No. Private organizations are not required to provide accused individuals with the opportunity to directly or indirectly cross examine the accuser and other witnesses at a live hearing.
“[T]here is no absolute right to a live hearing with cross-examination in administrative proceedings, even where constitutional due process applies.”
Justice Groban, writing for the Court
Gibson Dunn submitted an amicus brief on behalf of the California Women’s Law Center and Equal Rights Advocates in support of respondent: University of Southern California
What It Means:
The Court’s opinion is available here.
Gibson Dunn’s lawyers are available to assist in addressing any questions you may have regarding developments at the California Supreme Court. Please feel free to contact the following practice leaders:
Appellate and Constitutional Law Practice
|Thomas H. Dupree Jr.
|Allyson N. Ho
|Julian W. Poon
|Blaine H. Evanson
|Bradley J. Hamburger
|Michael J. Holecek
Related Practice: Litigation
|Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.