White Collar Defense and Investigations

LEADERS

Overview

The White Collar Defense and Investigations Practice Group defends businesses, senior executives, public officials and other individuals in a wide range of investigations and prosecutions.  The group is composed of more than 250 lawyers practicing across our U.S. and international offices and draws on the expertise of more than 75 of its members with extensive government experience.

Global Investigations Review ranked Gibson Dunn No. 1 in its 2021 GIR 30, its annual “ranking of the world’s best investigations practices,” for the fourth consecutive year.  Law360 named Gibson Dunn among its 2021 White Collar Groups of the Year, and Who’s Who Legal named the firm its Investigations Firm of the Year in 2020, for the second year in a row.  Additionally, Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific 2022 ranked the firm in its China and Hong Kong White Collar Crime – International Firms categories, and Benchmark Litigation US 2022 recognized the firm in Tier 1 nationally for White Collar Crime.  Chambers USA 2022 also ranked Gibson Dunn among “The Elite” (Tier 1) nationwide for Corporate Crime & Investigations, and Chambers and Partners named Gibson Dunn the winner of its Chambers USA Excellence Award in 2018 for Corporate Crime & Government Investigations.

The American Lawyer named Gibson Dunn a Finalist in its 2021 Litigation Department of the Year competition, noting that “when news breaks and the pressure rises, clients call Gibson Dunn’s litigators to regain control.”  This award follows our unprecedented four wins in this biennial competition. Gibson Dunn also was named a 2020 finalist for the White Collar/Regulatory Department of the Year, and in 2016 was the winner.

Many cases involve simultaneous criminal, civil and regulatory actions arising out of the same events.  To handle them, Gibson Dunn’s White Collar group draws on the full range of our skills and resources, collaborating with lawyers in other practice groups, allowing us to work with clients in almost every business sector in a wide array of substantive areas that includes:

  • Anti-money laundering
  • Antitrust
  • Computer and intellectual property crimes
  • Environmental violations and compliance
  • Export/import violations
  • U.S. False Claims Act
  • U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and U.K. Bribery Act
  • Health care fraud
  • Privacy and cybersecurity
  • Procurement fraud
  • Securities, financial institution and accounting fraud
  • Tax offenses

Our areas of service include:

  • Representation in grand jury and other government investigations
  • U.S. federal and state trials
  • Criminal appeals
  • Internal investigations
  • Representation in U.S. congressional and other legislative investigations
  • Regulatory defense
  • Compliance and internal-controls reviews and audits
  • Monitorships

The White Collar Defense and Investigations group includes numerous former U.S. federal and state prosecutors and officials, many of whom served at high levels within the U.S. Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other key investigative and prosecutorial arms of the government.  Our lawyers use firsthand knowledge of how government agencies conduct investigations and prosecutions to assist our clients in navigating those processes successfully.

Our White Collar group teams with Gibson Dunn’s Crisis Management Practice to provide coordinated and efficient advice.  The right response to a crisis requires a cohesive team equipped to immediately respond in an organized and strategic manner on multiple fronts, before issues become framed and fixed in the public mind.  This requires interacting immediately and simultaneously with federal and local prosecutors, regulatory agencies, concerned investors and directors, the private plaintiffs’ bar, congressional investigators and the media.

Gibson Dunn’s lawyers always prepare for “x factors” that inevitably arise in such high-stakes and high-profile matters.  We give legal and strategic advice for responding to crises both inside and outside the courtroom, and we have substantial experience operating in the public relations arena — a skill that has become essential to resolving the most serious and fast-moving white-collar legal challenges.

EXPERIENCE & RECENT REPRESENTATIONS

  • Represented multinational companies and individuals in connection with numerous international cartel investigations and antitrust-related U.S. grand jury investigations, including plea negotiations and/or leniency applications in the United States, the European Union, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, Brazil and other jurisdictions.
  • Defended U.S. and international companies in a variety of civil antitrust lawsuits, including class actions involving allegations of price fixing and related claims before state and federal courts throughout the United States.
  • Represented American Airlines and obtained summary judgment in a predatory pricing case brought by the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • Represented Atlantic Coast Airlines in its federal lawsuit to block a hostile takeover attempt in 2003, leading to a preliminary injunction that preserved Atlantic Coast’s independence.
  • Representing a prominent hedge fund in the trial defense against an SEC insider trading action.
  • Defending a former Big Four accounting firm audit partner at a trial involving allegations brought by the SEC Division of Enforcement and Investigations of the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
  • Defended the former general counsel of a major regional brokerage firm in a three-week securities enforcement trial before the SEC’s chief administrative law judge and obtained dismissal of all claims.
  • Defended the president of a hardware supply company in a criminal price-fixing case in a three-week trial and obtained acquittal on all counts.
  • Successfully defended at trial the former general counsel of a broker-dealer charged with failing to supervise a broker, culminating in an acquittal on all charges.
  • Defended the former head of the fixed income desk at a broker-dealer against fraud charges.  Following a two-week evidentiary hearing and post-hearing briefing, the hearing panel cleared our client of all charges.
  • Handling the appeal of a Silicon Valley corporate lawyer’s jury trial conviction for alleged bribery of a California law enforcement official.
  • Won a unanimous decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court narrowed the scope of liability under the False Claims Act by adopting a restrictive interpretation of the statute’s intent requirement.
  • Filed a successful petition for writ of certiorari and merits briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of media entrepreneur Conrad Black.  The Court unanimously reversed a court of appeals judgment that had upheld Mr. Black’s mail fraud and obstruction convictions.
  • Successfully appealed to the 11th Circuit, which reversed all convictions on all counts of all four defendants.  We thereafter successfully opposed the solicitor general’s petition for U.S. Supreme Court review of the decision.
  • Represented a Big Four accounting firm in an investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations into alleged offshore tax evasion.  This investigation culminated in a hearing at which our client successfully defended its actions, resulting in no follow-up by the subcommittee and the avoidance of negative press coverage and reputational damage.
  • Representing two career colleges being investigated by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee as well as by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).  This investigation also involves related civil litigation as well as a separate congressional investigation that has looked into the GAO inquiry.
  • Representing a telecommunications company in multiple congressional investigations relating to the company’s interactions with the Federal Communications Commission.
  • Representing a major multinational company under investigation by the House Energy and Commerce Committee for alleged abusive labor practices.
  • Representing a major health insurer before the House Energy and Commerce, House Oversight and Government Reform, and Senate Commerce Committees investigating practices within the health insurance industry.  This multifront defense of a series of high-profile investigations required careful coordination of the information and documents provided to different congressional committees.
  • Represented a major financial services company before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations regarding causes of the financial markets crisis.  This investigation included a hearing at which seven witnesses from the company testified over a 10-hour period.
  • Represented a company that holds construction contracts in several war zones in connection with investigation by the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan regarding Afghanistan reconstruction contracts.
  • Obtained dismissal of numerous lawsuits brought against the largest securities self-regulatory organization during the course of almost 20 years.
  • Defended Nursing Personnel, a Brooklyn-based home health aide agency, and its COO against overbilling and other charges by the New York Attorney General.  We convinced a state court judge to keep the indictment under seal and developed a compelling argument that the defendants had acted in good faith and in accordance with existing DOH regulations.  We also uncovered exculpatory information that the prosecutors failed to disclose, leading to the dismissal of the felony criminal case against the company and the COO.
  • Represented more than 20 present and former Kmart officers in connection with an SEC investigation and related DOJ investigation of Kmart accounting and disclosure issues.
  • Successfully represented a major investment bank in an investigation of the arrangement and syndication of commercial real estate loans to lenders.  Following presentation of findings to the staff, the regulator closed the investigation.
  • Successfully represented a major hedge fund in an investigation into potential insider trading in credit default swaps.  Following presentation of findings to the staff, the regulator did not pursue the investigation.
  • Successfully represented the former managing director of a major investment bank in an investigation of proprietary trading of credit derivatives.  After receiving a Wells notice, we persuaded the SEC staff not to pursue an enforcement action.
  • Represented a hedge fund adviser in an investigation of trading in advance of public offerings and compliance with Rule 105.
  • Successfully represented a Fortune 500 company in an SEC inquiry of accounting issues.  Following presentation of information, the staff closed the inquiry.
  • Acted as lead counsel in the representation of a Japanese manufacturing company in connection with a trade-secrets investigation conducted by DOJ and the FBI, resulting in no charges filed and no actions taken against the clients.
  • Represented one of the largest publicly traded U.S. proprietary school companies in a federal criminal and SEC investigation across the United States alleging fraudulent student recruitment and financial aid practices.  The DOJ declined prosecution and the SEC closed its investigation without action.
  • Conducting a compliance program effectiveness review on behalf of a Fortune 500 pharmaceutical and medical device company currently under an HHS-OIG Corporate Integrity Agreement.
  • Advising several major financial institutions on anticorruption policies, including hotline issues, data privacy and surveying of laws in dozens of jurisdictions.
  • Advised a multinational petroleum companies with respect to numerous transactions and investments involving potential FCPA violations in the former Soviet Union, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Africa and Latin America.
  • Provided ongoing advice to a major petrochemical services company on FCPA compliance issues, including specific concerns regarding the use of agents and facilitating payments, as well as the impact of joint venture agreements.
  • Developed a global FCPA compliance program for a Fortune 200 financial services company with extensive international operations.
  • Developed a global FCPA compliance program for an international shipping and logistics company with worldwide operations.
  • Represented the audit committee of a large multinational management consulting firm relating to FCPA exposure arising out of subcontracting practices in China.
  • Advised a Fortune 50 technology company regarding appropriate FCPA-related internal controls as part of larger Sarbanes-Oxley compliance program.
  • Provided ongoing advice on FCPA compliance issues involving foreign agents to a Fortune 25 company with extensive international operations.
  • Advised a large U.S. defense contractor with respect to the voluntary disclosure to the DOJ of a suspected FCPA violation.
  • Counsel to two companies under an FCPA compliance monitorship: Daimler AG and Innospec, Inc.
  • Appointed compliance monitors in two U.S. compliance monitorships: DePuy, Inc. and NuLine Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  • Appointed independent compliance monitors and independent counsel to the compliance monitor in three FCPA monitorships: Statoil ASA, Siemens AG and Alliance One, Inc.
  • Represented Facebook in an FTC investigation and enforcement action involving the company’s online privacy practices.  The case resulted in a settlement that avoided any monetary penalty.  In a recent privacy report, the FTC describes the Facebook investigation as its largest privacy investigation to date.
  • Represented Sony BMG in a government investigation of allegations that Sony’s software violated California anti-hacking and privacy laws as well as the Unfair Competition Law and the False Advertising Act.
  • Representing a prominent online company in its interactions with DOJ related to automated attacks on the company’s website, which resulted in the indictment and conviction of the attackers.
  • Represented a professional services company related to a criminal referral of two former employees who illegally accessed the company’s computer systems and stole trade secrets.  As a result of the representation, the U.S. government brought criminal charges against the two former employees.
  • Represented a leading online retailer in responding to a data breach related to a network intrusion and exfiltration of credit card information; coordinated with law enforcement concerning the security incident.
  • Defending an international transportation public company in connection with multiple state and federal government investigations relating to an environmental incident.
  • Representing a developer in an EPA enforcement action, a citizen suit and a criminal investigation alleging violation of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
  • Defending a U.S. retail company against various criminal and civil investigations involving the handling of hazardous materials under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Clean Water Act.
  • Represented the board of directors of a multinational oil and gas public company in connection with a DOJ criminal investigation into an environmental incident.
  • Defended a real estate development firm in a grand jury investigation arising from alleged violations of the Clean Water Act.
  • Defended a municipality in a federal criminal investigation alleging Clean Water Act violations.  No charges were filed.
  • Represented multiple parties in a variety of enforcement actions under the California Health and Safety Code provisions for the protection of air quality before the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the California Air Resources Board.
  • Represented multiple parties in a variety of enforcement actions before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency including alleged violations of the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
  • Defending a multinational oil exploration company in an investigation by Departments of Commerce and the Treasury into alleged export control violations.
  • Representing numerous clients before the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the Department of the Treasury to seek resolution of sanctions issues and/or to respond to alleged violations of embargo regulations.
  • Defended a maritime company in a federal criminal investigation alleging violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution From Ships.
  • Lead counsel for the Japanese steel industry in a successful effort to have antidumping duties on corrosion-resistant steel, hot-rolled steel and cut-to-length plate revoked by the International Trade Commission.
  • Served as lead counsel for the U.S. industry producing chlorinated isocyanurates in successfully obtaining an antidumping order on imports from China and Spain.
  • Represented two Canadian softwood lumber producers in antidumping investigations by the Department of Commerce.
  • Defending a leading health care services provider in connection with civil and criminal False Claims Act investigations by the U.S. Attorney’s office, HHS-OIG and DOJ.
  • Defending a Fortune 500 health care services provider in connection with a nationwide U.S. False Claims Act investigation by the DOJ relating to alleged fraud and quality of care issues.
  • Advising a medical billing company in connection with California state and federal investigations into alleged workers’ compensation fraud.
  • Advising the San Francisco-based trustee of an employee benefit plan in connection with civil and criminal investigations by the U.S. Attorney’s office and Department of Labor relating to alleged billing fraud and kickbacks.
  • Conducting various internal investigations on behalf of multinational life sciences public companies in connection with alleged regulatory and compliance code violations.
  • Conducting a compliance program effectiveness review on behalf of a Fortune 500 pharmaceutical and medical device company currently under an HHS-OIG Corporate Integrity Agreement.
  • Represented Facebook in an FTC investigation and enforcement action involving the company’s online privacy practices.  The case resulted in a settlement that avoided any monetary penalty.  In a recent privacy report, the FTC describes the Facebook investigation as its largest privacy investigation to date.
  • Represented Sony BMG in a government investigation of allegations that Sony’s software violated California anti-hacking and privacy laws as well as the Unfair Competition Law and the False Advertising Act.
  • Obtained a first-of-its-kind order dismissing the complaint in a consolidated class action alleging that our client surreptitiously tracked Internet users and respawned deleted data in violation of several federal and state laws.  The dismissal was the first ruling in an Internet privacy action finding that plaintiffs had failed to allege a cognizable injury.  This order followed the court’s preliminary approval of several settlements of plaintiffs’ claims against other defendants in the same cases.
  • Led the successful efforts of numerous defendants to obtain dismissal of a putative class of all users of apps on iOS devices asserting claims against several different companies, such as our clients Flurry, Inc. and Pinch Media, that provide advertising and analytics services to application developers.  Plaintiffs alleged that these defendants collected and disclosed users’ personal information located on their mobile devices without their knowledge or permission.
  • Representing a defense contractor before the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations, Defense Contract Audit Agency and SEC in connection with Sarbanes-Oxley Act whistleblower claims raised by the contractor’s chief compliance officer.
  • Representing a defense contractor in a U.S. Procurement Integrity Act investigation involving the Naval Criminal Investigative Service and Naval Acquisition Integrity Office.
  • Representing a defense contractor in a grand jury investigation arising from allegations of improper political contributions.
  • Representing a leading financial services firm in connection with criminal federal investigations into the mortgage-backed securities market.
  • Representing numerous hedge funds in connection with criminal and civil insider trading investigations by various U.S. Attorneys’ offices and SEC regional offices.
  • Represented a group of independent directors in class action securities lawsuits and related federal grand jury and SEC investigations into the collapse of a publicly traded subprime mortgage company.
  • Represented a public company in federal grand jury and related SEC investigations alleging wire and securities fraud.  No charges were filed.
  • Representing the former vice chair of a major Swiss bank, as well as a former adviser to the bank, in connection with an investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York for tax evasion issues.
  • Advising multiple financial institutions regarding compliance with and potential exposure arising from the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and other U.S. offshore compliance measures.
  • Representing a Big Four accounting firm in an investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations into alleged offshore tax evasion.

RECENT PUBLICATIONS

U.S. Agencies Issue Pledge to Investigate AI Development and Use

-April 11, 2024

The Corporate Transparency Act Declared Unconstitutional: What It Means for You

-March 18, 2024

Proposed California Legislation AB 3129 Would Require Attorney General Approval for Private Equity and Hedge Fund Acquisitions of Certain Healthcare Entities

-March 13, 2024

Precedent-Setting Decisions Show the Promise of New York’s Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act

-March 11, 2024

BYOD: Internal Investigations and Employee Personal Devices

-March 7, 2024

Corporate Resolutions 2023 Year-End Update

-March 7, 2024

False Claims Act 2023 Year-End Update

-March 4, 2024

Webcast: 2023 Year-End FCPA Update

-February 29, 2024

Webcast: Recent Developments in Multilateral Development Bank Enforcement

-February 28, 2024

Gibson Dunn Ranked in The Legal 500 Deutschland 2024

-February 15, 2024

2023 Year-End FCPA Update

-February 15, 2024

Webcast: Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering and International Trade Compliance and Enforcement Annual Update

-February 7, 2024

Who’s Who Thought Leaders – Global Elite 2024 Recognizes Fifteen Gibson Dunn Partners

-February 6, 2024

Top 12 Developments in Anti-Money Laundering Enforcement in 2023

-February 2, 2024

Who’s Who Legal Germany 2024 Recognizes Six Gibson Dunn Partners

-January 26, 2024

Former Deutsche Bank Head of Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement Joins Gibson Dunn in Hong Kong

-January 25, 2024

Webcast: FCPA Trends in the Emerging Markets

-January 23, 2024

Self-Reporting to the Authorities and Other Disclosure Obligations: The US Perspective 2024

-January 19, 2024

Extraterritorial Impact of New UK Corporate Criminal Liability Laws

-January 12, 2024

Inside Higher Education’s New FCA Liability Challenges

-December 26, 2023

Global Legal Insights – Bribery & Corruption 2024

-December 7, 2023

London verschärft das Unternehmensstrafrecht

-November 27, 2023

GIR Ranks Gibson Dunn No. 1 Among World’s Best Investigations Practices 2023

-November 17, 2023

Second Circuit Limits SEC Disgorgement – Decision Puts Remedy in Question in Wide Range of Cases

-November 16, 2023

Who’s Who Legal Recognizes 42 Gibson Dunn Partners in its 2024 Thought Leaders USA Guide

-November 13, 2023

Gibson Dunn Ranked in Legal 500 Latin America 2024

-October 26, 2023

Who’s Who Legal Thought Leaders Global Investigations Review 2023 Recognizes Seven Gibson Dunn Partners

-October 24, 2023

Eight Gibson Dunn Partners Recognized by Who’s Who Legal 2023 Business Crime Defence

-October 3, 2023

A Litigious First Half of the Year for the False Claims Act

-October 3, 2023

Webcast: False Claims Act Hot Topics – Cybersecurity, Government Contracting, and Technology Companies

-September 27, 2023

Corporate Resolutions Update – 2023

-September 8, 2023

Who’s Who Legal 2023 Recognizes Two Gibson Dunn Partners in Thought Leaders – Mainland China & Hong Kong SAR

-August 24, 2023

Webcast: Asia Compliance Risks and Mitigation Strategies

-August 15, 2023

2023 Mid-Year Securities Enforcement Update

-August 7, 2023

EU Strengthens Cross-Border Access to E-Evidence in Criminal Proceedings

-August 1, 2023

Matthew Nunan Interviewed by the Following the Rules Podcast

-July 27, 2023

International Comparative Legal Guide to: Anti-Money Laundering 2023

-July 11, 2023

Best Lawyers in Germany 2024 Recognizes 24 Gibson Dunn Attorneys

-June 16, 2023

How Ambitious New EU Directive Seeks To Fight Corruption

-June 8, 2023

Gibson Dunn Earns 108 Top-Tier Rankings in Chambers USA 2023

-June 1, 2023

Webcast: DOJ’s Consumer Protection Branch

-May 31, 2023

Who’s Who Legal Recognizes 13 Gibson Dunn Partners in 2023 Investigations Guide

-May 30, 2023

California’s City and County Attorneys Poised to Flex Newly Granted UCL Investigatory Power

-May 18, 2023

Supreme Court Rejects Allegations That Social-Media Companies Did Not Do “Enough” To Block Terrorist Content But Declines To Address Scope Of Section 230

-May 18, 2023

Gibson Dunn Ranked in Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific 2023

-May 17, 2023

Child and Forced Labor Risks Global Task Force

-May 17, 2023

DOJ’s Consumer Protection Branch Releases Second Annual Recent Highlights Report

-May 15, 2023

EU Commission Proposes Harmonized Framework to Combat Corruption

-May 15, 2023

Supreme Court Rejects “Right-to-Control” Theory And Reaffirms That The Federal Fraud Statutes Reach Only Traditional Property Interests

-May 11, 2023

Supreme Court Overturns Wire Fraud Conviction of Private Citizen Under Honest-Services Theory After Holding That The Jury Instructions Given Were Too Vague

-May 11, 2023

DOJ’s Consumer Protection Branch Announces New Corporate Enforcement Policies

-March 28, 2023

Webcast: 2022 Year-End FCPA Update

-March 28, 2023

Gibson Dunn Ranked in Chambers Europe 2023

-March 16, 2023

DOJ Updates Its Guidance on Corporate Compliance Programs

-March 14, 2023

2022 Year-End FCPA Update

-March 2, 2023

Former U.S. District Judge George Hazel to Join Gibson Dunn in Washington, D.C.

-March 1, 2023

Webcast: Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering and Sanctions Enforcement and Compliance Update

-February 28, 2023

Gibson Dunn Ranked in The Legal 500 Deutschland 2023

-February 16, 2023

2022 Year-End False Claims Act Update

-February 8, 2023

2022 Year-End Securities Enforcement Update

-February 2, 2023

Webcast: Congressional Investigations in the 118th Congress: What to Expect and How to Prepare

-January 18, 2023

Lawdragon Names 19 Partners Among its 2023 500 Leading Lawyers in America and Hall of Fame Honorees

-January 17, 2023

Webcast: FCPA Trends in the Emerging Markets

-January 17, 2023

Gibson Dunn Ranked in 2023 Chambers Greater China Region Guide

-January 13, 2023

Webcasts: Gibson Dunn’s Annual California MCLE Marathon – 2023

-January 12, 2023

Self-Reporting to the Authorities and Other Disclosure Obligations: The US Perspective

-January 11, 2023

Webcast: Internal Investigations

-January 11, 2023

Who’s Who Legal Recognizes 39 Gibson Dunn Partners in its Inaugural Thought Leaders USA Guide

-January 9, 2023

Omnibus Electric Vehicle Update

-January 5, 2023

Who’s Who Thought Leaders – Global Elite 2023 Recognizes Eleven Gibson Dunn Partners

-January 4, 2023

Penalty Relief Available: Recent Jurisprudence Offers the Opportunity for Significantly Lower Fines and Other Penalties in White Collar Resolutions with DOJ and Other Agencies

-January 3, 2023

Seven Gibson Dunn Attorneys Named Among Washingtonian Magazine’s 2022 Top Lawyers

-January 3, 2023

Potential liability under the third-party-payment provision: Due diligence a must do

-December 20, 2022

Roscoe Jones, Jr., Karin Portlock and Brendan Stewart Named to The National Black Lawyers Top 100 Black Lawyers 2023

-December 2, 2022

Some more carrots, and definitely more sticks: DOJ corporate criminal enforcement

-December 1, 2022

GIR Ranks Gibson Dunn No. 1 Among World’s Best Investigations Practices 2022

-November 17, 2022

Gibson Dunn Promotes 37 Lawyers to Partnership

-November 15, 2022

Flagging FCPA Misconduct in Virtual Work Environments

-November 1, 2022

Leading German Legal Publication JUVE Recommends Gibson Dunn Germany in its Annual Handbook 2022/2023

-October 28, 2022

Gibson Dunn Ranked in Chambers UK 2023

-October 20, 2022

Gibson Dunn Ranked in Legal 500 Latin America 2023

-October 19, 2022

Euromoney’s Rising Star Awards 2022 Recognizes 16 Gibson Dunn Partners

-October 12, 2022

Benchmark Litigation US 2023 Gives Top Marks to Gibson Dunn

-October 6, 2022

Twenty-Two Gibson Dunn Lawyers Recognized in Expert Guides’ Women in Business Law

-October 6, 2022

From the Broader Perspective: Deputy Attorney General Announces Additional Revisions to DOJ’s Corporate Criminal Enforcement Policies

-October 3, 2022

Gibson Dunn Ranked in The Legal 500 UK 2023

-September 29, 2022

Brendan Stewart Named to The National Black Lawyers Top 100 Black Lawyers

-September 21, 2022

Structuring California Attorney General Settlements to Maximize Preclusive Effect on Private Litigants

-September 7, 2022

Law360 Names Eight Gibson Dunn Partners as 2022 MVPs

-September 6, 2022

Senators’ Call for Increased DOJ Use of Suspension and Debarment Could Impact False Claims Act Investigations and Resolutions

-August 31, 2022

Who’s Who Legal 2022 Recognizes Gibson Dunn Partners in Thought Leaders – Mainland China & Hong Kong SAR

-August 24, 2022

Germany Lifted Its Foreign Discovery Ban, But Hurdles Persist

-August 11, 2022

Who’s Who Legal Thought Leaders Global Investigations Review 2022 Recognizes Four Gibson Dunn Partners

-August 1, 2022

Joel Cohen and Mylan Denerstein Named Litigators of the Week

-August 1, 2022

Labor Department Proposes “QPAM” Changes

-July 26, 2022

Best Lawyers in Germany 2023 Recognizes 26 Gibson Dunn Attorneys

-June 24, 2022

Gibson Dunn Ranked in 2022 U.S. Legal 500

-June 22, 2022

Gibson Dunn Earns 101 Top-Tier Rankings in Chambers USA 2022

-June 1, 2022

Jarkesy Wins Relief From ALJ Control After Years of Fighting for His Right to a Jury Trial

-May 25, 2022

International Comparative Legal Guide to: Anti-Money Laundering 2022

-May 20, 2022

Gibson Dunn Ranked in Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific 2022

-May 9, 2022

Who’s Who Legal Recognizes 12 Gibson Dunn Partners in 2022 Investigations Guide

-March 30, 2022

Webcast: Corporate Compliance and Sentencing Guidelines

-March 30, 2022

Gibson Dunn Ranked in Chambers Europe 2022

-March 17, 2022

The Biden Administration’s Digital Assets Executive Order and Its Implications

-March 10, 2022

Webcast: The World Reacts to the Crisis in Ukraine: Sanctions and Export Controls Imposed by the U.S., the EU, the UK, Australia, Japan and Other Countries

-March 10, 2022

Recent Settlement Indicates Donations by Healthcare Entities Could Be Subject to Increased DOJ Scrutiny

-March 7, 2022

FCA enforcement, one year into the Biden administration

-February 25, 2022